S'abonner

Discrepancies in Left Ventricular Mass Calculation Based on Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Measurements in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy - 01/10/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.009 
Hee-Young Seo, MD a, b, Seung-Pyo Lee, MD, PhD a, b, , Jun-Bean Park, MD a, b, Joo Myung Lee, MD a, b, Eun-Ah Park, MD, PhD c, Sung-A Chang, MD, PhD d, Hyung-Kwan Kim, MD, PhD a, b, Sung-Ji Park, MD, PhD d, Whal Lee, MD, PhD c, Yong-Jin Kim, MD, PhD a, b, Sang-Chol Lee, MD, PhD d, Seung Woo Park, MD, PhD d, Dae-Won Sohn, MD, PhD a, b, Yeon Hyeon Choe, MD, PhD d
a Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea 
b Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea 
c Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea 
d Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 

Reprint requests: Seung-Pyo Lee, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.

Abstract

Background

Increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and its accurate assessment is important. The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of difference among various methods of LV mass calculation based on transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) measurements and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements, especially in patients with aortic stenosis with varying degrees of LV hypertrophy (LVH). The mechanism underlying this disagreement was also investigated.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis and 33 control subjects matched for age, sex, body weight, and height were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. All patients underwent TTE and CMR imaging. LV mass index (LVMI) was calculated using three formulas on the basis of TTE measurements (the Penn-cube, American Society of Echocardiography [ASE], and Teichholz methods) and compared with measurements obtained using CMR, the reference method.

Results

Although all methods calculated using TTE measurements showed good correlations with CMR measurements, LVMI measured using the Penn-cube and ASE methods tended to be larger than LVMI measured using CMR (difference in LVMI by the Penn-cube and ASE methods, 59.3 ± 29.7 and 30.6 ± 22.3 g/m2, respectively). This tendency decreased with the Teichholz method (difference in LVMI by the Teichholz method, 22.9 ± 19.1 g/m2). The degree of LVMI overestimation was significantly different among the three methods (P < .001 by one-way analysis of variance), which was more significant in patients with LVH, especially with the Penn-cube method (differences between CMR and TTE measurements in patients with aortic stenosis and LVH, 66.3 ± 34.8 vs 31.2 ± 26.6 vs 15.5 ± 20.9 g/m2 for the Penn-cube, ASE, and Teichholz methods, respectively; P < .001 with post hoc Tukey analysis). There was a good correlation between LVMI and LV diameter-to-length ratio (r = 0.468, P < .001), which suggested that the left ventricle takes on a more globular shape with the increase of LVMI, resulting in a significant deviation from the basic assumptions on which the Penn-cube and ASE methods were built.

Conclusions

Current methods of calculating LVMI from echocardiographic measurements carry a tendency to measure LVMI larger than methods based on CMR measurements, which was more significant in patients with LVH. The change of the left ventricle’s shape with LVH may be a plausible explanation for this, and a correction method may be needed when calculating LVMI from echocardiographic measurements, especially in patients with LVH and smaller body size.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

The Penn-cube, ASE, and Teichholz methods tend to measure LVMI larger than CMR in Asians.
The degree of LVMI overestimation is greater in patients with LVH than in those without LVH.
The degree of overestimation is greater with the Penn-cube and ASE methods than with the Teichholz method.
This discrepancy between CMR and TTE imaging may be due to the deviation from the basic geometric assumptions on which the Penn-cube and ASE methods were built.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Aortic stenosis, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Echocardiography, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Abbreviations : AS, ASE, AVA, CMR, IVSTd, LV, LVH, LVIDd, LVMI, PWTd, TTE


Plan


 This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project (A120753), Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea.


© 2015  American Society of Echocardiography. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 28 - N° 10

P. 1194 - octobre 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Role of Diastolic Function in Preserved Exercise Capacity in Patients with Reduced Ejection Fractions
  • Takahiro Ohara, Hiroyuki Iwano, Vinay Thohan, Dalane W. Kitzman, Bharathi Upadhya, Min Pu, William C. Little
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pericardiectomy is Associated with Improvement in Longitudinal Displacement of Left Ventricular Free Wall Due to Increased Counterclockwise Septal-to-Lateral Rotational Displacement
  • Kazuaki Negishi, Zoran B. Popovi?, Tomoko Negishi, Hirohiko Motoki, M. Chadi Alraies, Srisakul Chirakarnjanakorn, Arun Dahiya, Allan L. Klein

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.