Subcutaneous Immunotherapy and Sublingual Immunotherapy : Comparative Efficacy, Current and Potential Indications, and Warnings—United States Versus Europe - 27/11/15
, Melina Makatsori, MD b, Moises A. Calderon, MD, PhD b, cRésumé |
Subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy are effective for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma and with some support for use in selected patients with atopic dermatitis. The sequence of immunologic responses is the same, irrespective of the route of administration, and similar disease modification has been demonstrated. However, there are differences between the two approaches. The most important is the greatly reduced likelihood of sublingual immunotherapy producing systemic reactions. There are major drawbacks for sublingual immunotherapy in regard to dosing. Finally, there is the question of relative clinical efficacy, with the currently available data favoring subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : SCIT, SLIT, AIT, Immunotherapy, Allergic rhinitis, Allergic asthma
Plan
| Disclosure statement: Consultant to Merck and Circassia; grant support from Circassia (H.S. Nelson). Lecture Fees: ALK, Stallergenes, Merck, and Allergopharma, Consultancy Fees: ALK, Stallergenes, Merck, and Hal Allergy (M.A. Calderon). |
Vol 36 - N° 1
P. 13-24 - février 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
