S'abonner

Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial - 01/12/15

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00389-7 
Francesca Gay, MD a, Stefania Oliva, MD a, Maria Teresa Petrucci, MD b, Concetta Conticello, MD c, Lucio Catalano, MD d, Paolo Corradini, MD e, Agostina Siniscalchi, MD f, Valeria Magarotto, MD a, Luděk Pour, MD g, Angelo Carella, MD h, Alessandra Malfitano, BS a, Daniela Petrò, MD i, Andrea Evangelista, MS j, Stefano Spada, MA a, Norbert Pescosta, MD k, Paola Omedè, PhD a, Philip Campbell, MD l, Anna Marina Liberati, MD m, Massimo Offidani, MD n, Roberto Ria, MD o, Stefano Pulini, MD p, Francesca Patriarca, MD q, Roman Hajek, MD r, Andrew Spencer, MD s, Mario Boccadoro, MD a, Antonio Palumbo, DrMD a,
a Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy 
b Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy 
c Divisione di Ematologia, Azienda Policlinico-OVE, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy 
d Policlinico Universitario Federico II, Naples, Italy 
e Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy 
f UOC Ematologia Ospedale S Eugenio, Rome, Italy 
g Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic 
h UOC Ematologia IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy 
i Hematology Department, Niquarda Ca’Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy 
j Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy 
k Ematologia e Centro TMO Ospedale Centrale Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy 
l Haematology Department, Cancer Services, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia 
m A O S Maria di Terni, S C Oncoematologia, Terni, Italy 
n Division of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy 
o University of Bari Aldo Moro Medical School, Department of Biomedical Science, Internal Medicine G Baccelli Policlinico, Bari, Italy 
p Dipartimento di Ematologia, Medicina Trasfusionale e Biotecnologie, U O Ematologia Clinica, Ospedale Civile Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy 
q Azienda O U di Udine, DISM, Università di Udine, Udine, Italy 
r Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 
s Department of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 

*Correspondence to: Dr Antonio Palumbo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, ItalyCorrespondence to: Dr Antonio PalumboDivision of HematologyUniversity of TorinoTurin10126Italy

Summary

Background

High-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard approach in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Our aims were to compare consolidation with high-dose melphalan plus ASCT versus chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) plus lenalidomide, and maintenance with lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide alone.

Methods

We did an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 study at 59 centres in Australia, Czech Republic, and Italy. We enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma aged 65 years or younger. Patients received a common induction with four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg, days 1–21) and dexamethasone (40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and subsequent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem-cell mobilisation and collection. Using a 2 × 2 partial factorial design, we randomised patients to consolidation with either chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (six cycles of cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15], dexamethasone [40 mg, days 1, 8, 15, and 22], and lenalidomide [25 mg, days 1–21]) or two courses of high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) and ASCT. We also randomised patients to maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg, days 1–21) plus prednisone (50 mg, every other day) or lenalidomide alone. A simple randomisation sequence was used to assign patients at enrolment into one of the four groups (1:1:1:1 ratio), but the treatment allocation was disclosed only when the patient reached the end of the induction and confirmed their eligibility for consolidation. Both the patient and the treating clinician did not know the consolidation and maintenance arm until that time. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is ongoing and some patients are still receiving maintenance. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01091831.

Findings

389 patients were enrolled between July 6, 2009, and May 6, 2011, with 256 eligible for consolidation (127 high-dose melphalan and ASCT and 129 chemotherapy plus lenalidomide) and 223 eligible for maintenance (117 lenalidomide plus prednisone and 106 lenalidomide alone). Median follow-up was 52·0 months (IQR 30·4–57·6). Progression-free survival during consolidation was significantly shorter with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide compared with high-dose melphalan and ASCT (median 28·6 months [95% CI 20·6–36·7] vs 43·3 months [33·2–52·2]; hazard ratio [HR] for the first 24 months 2·51, 95% CI 1·60–3·94; p<0·0001). Progression-free survival did not differ between maintenance treatments (median 37·5 months [95% CI 27·8–not evaluable] with lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 28·5 months [22·5–46·5] with lenalidomide alone; HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·59–1·20; p=0·34). Fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide than with high-dose melphalan and ASCT; the most frequent were haematological (34 [26%] of 129 patients vs 107 [84%] of 127 patients), gastrointestinal (six [5%] vs 25 [20%]), and infection (seven [5%] vs 24 [19%]). Haematological serious adverse events were reported in two (2%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and no patients allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (10%) patients assigned chemotherapy plus lenalidomide and nine (7%) allocated high-dose melphalan and ASCT. During maintenance, adverse events did not differ between groups. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (nine [8%] of 117 patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone vs 14 [13%] of 106 allocated lenalidomide alone), infection (eight [8%] vs five [5%]), and systemic toxicities (seven [6%] vs two [2%]). Non-haematological serious adverse events were reported in 13 (11%) patients assigned lenalidomide plus prednisone versus ten (9%) allocated lenalidomide alone. Four patients died because of adverse events, three from infections (two during induction and one during consolidation) and one because of cardiac toxic effects.

Interpretation

Consolidation with high-dose melphalan and ASCT remains the preferred option in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma, despite a better toxicity profile with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide.

Funding

Celgene.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2015  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 16 - N° 16

P. 1617-1629 - décembre 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
  • Anna Wilkins, Helen Mossop, Isabel Syndikus, Vincent Khoo, David Bloomfield, Chris Parker, John Logue, Christopher Scrase, Helen Patterson, Alison Birtle, John Staffurth, Zafar Malik, Miguel Panades, Chinnamani Eswar, John Graham, Martin Russell, Peter Kirkbride, Joe M O’Sullivan, Annie Gao, Clare Cruickshank, Clare Griffin, David Dearnaley, Emma Hall
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Nedaplatin plus docetaxel versus cisplatin plus docetaxel for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG5208L): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
  • Takehito Shukuya, Takeharu Yamanaka, Takashi Seto, Haruko Daga, Koichi Goto, Hideo Saka, Shunichi Sugawara, Toshiaki Takahashi, Soichiro Yokota, Hiroyasu Kaneda, Tomoya Kawaguchi, Seisuke Nagase, Tetsuya Oguri, Yasuo Iwamoto, Takashi Nishimura, Yoshihiro Hattori, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Yoichi Nakanishi, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, West Japan Oncology Group

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.