Should Antihypertensive Treatment Recommendations Differ in Patients With and Without Coronary Heart Disease? (from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]) - 15/12/15
, Charles E. Ford, PhD b, M. Sarah Baraniuk, PhD b, Sara L. Pressel, MS b, Mahshid A. Assadi, MD c, Paula T. Einhorn, MD, MS d, L. Julian Haywood, MD e, Ekambaram Ilamathi, MD f, Suzanne Oparil, MD g, Tamrat M. Retta, MD, PhD hfor the
ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
Abstract |
Thiazide-type diuretics have been recommended for initial treatment of hypertension in most patients, but should this recommendation differ for patients with and without coronary heart disease (CHD)? The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was a randomized, double-blind hypertension treatment trial in 42,418 participants with high risk of combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) (25% with preexisting CHD). This post hoc analysis compares long-term major clinical outcomes in those assigned amlodipine (n = 9048) or lisinopril (n = 9,054) with those assigned chlorthalidone (n = 15,255), stratified by CHD status. After 4 to 8 years, randomized treatment was discontinued. Total follow-up (active treatment + passive surveillance using national databases for deaths and hospitalizations) was 8 to 13 years. For most CVD outcomes, end-stage renal disease, and total mortality, there were no differences across randomized treatment arms regardless of baseline CHD status. In-trial rates of CVD were significantly higher for lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone, and rates of heart failure were significantly higher for amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone in those with and without CHD (overall hazard ratios [HRs] 1.10, p <0.001, and 1.38, p <0.001, respectively). During extended follow-up, significant outcomes according to CHD status interactions (p = 0.012) were noted in amlodipine versus chlorthalidone comparison for CVD and CHD mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.04, and 0.84, p = 0.04, respectively) in those with CHD at baseline (HR 1.06, p = 0.15, and 1.08, p = 0.17) and in those without. The results of the overall increased stroke mortality in lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.2; p = 0.03) and hospitalized heart failure in amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.12; p = 0.01) during extended follow-up did not differ by baseline CHD status. In conclusion, these results provide no reason to alter our previous recommendation to include a properly dosed diuretic (such as chlorthalidone 12.5 to 25 mg/day) in the initial antihypertensive regimen for most hypertensive patients.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| For a complete list of members of the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group, see JAMA 2000; 283:1973–1975. |
|
| Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00000542. |
|
| ALLHAT was supported by contracts NO1-HC-35130 and HHSN268201100036 C with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. It received contributions of study medications supplied by Pfizer (New York, NY) (amlodipine and doxazosin), AstraZeneca (London, United Kingdom) (atenolol and lisinopril), and Bristol-Meyers Squibb (New York, NY) (pravastatin). National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute also received financial support of ALLHAT provided by Pfizer. |
|
| See page 114 for disclosure information. |
Vol 117 - N° 1
P. 105-115 - janvier 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
