S'abonner

Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation - 24/12/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.047 
John A. Harris, MD a, , Carolyn W. Swenson, MD b, Shitanshu Uppal, MD c, Neil Kamdar, MS e, Nichole Mahnert, MD d, Sawsan As-Sanie, MD d, Daniel M. Morgan, MD b
a Division of Women’s Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
b Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
c Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
d Minimally Invasive Surgery Program, Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 

Corresponding author: John A. Harris, MD.

Abstract

Background

In April 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its first safety communication discouraging “the use of laparoscopic power morcellation during hysterectomy or myomectomy for the treatment of women with uterine fibroids.” Due to the concern of worsening outcomes for patients with occult uterine malignancy, specifically uterine leiomyosarcoma, the FDA recommended a significant change to existing surgical planning, patient consent, and surgical technique in the United States.

Objective

We sought to report temporal trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy and postoperative complications before and after the April 17, 2014, FDA safety communication concerning the use of power morcellation during myomectomy or hysterectomy.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study was performed with patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from Jan. 1, 2013, through Dec. 31, 2014. The rates of abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy, as well as the rates of major postoperative complications and 30-day hospital readmissions and reoperations, were compared before and after April 17, 2014, the date of the original FDA safety communication. Major postoperative complications included blood transfusions, vaginal cuff infection, vaginal cuff dehiscence, ureteral obstruction, vesicovaginal fistula, deep and organ space surgical site infection, acute renal failure, respiratory failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis requiring therapy, cerebral vascular accident, cardiac arrest, and death. We calculated the median episode cost related to hysterectomy readmissions using Michigan Value Collaborative data. Analyses were performed using robust multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models.

Results

There were 18,299 hysterectomies available for analysis during the study period. In all, 2753 cases were excluded due to an indication for cancer, cervical dysplasia, or endometrial hyperplasia, and 174 cases were excluded due to missing covariate data. Compared to the 15 months preceding the FDA safety communication, in the 8 months afterward, utilization of laparoscopic hysterectomies decreased by 4.1% (P = .005) and both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies increased (1.7%, P = .112 and 2.4%, P = .012, respectively). Major surgical complications not including blood transfusions significantly increased after the date of the FDA safety communication, from 2.2-2.8% (P = .015), and the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days also increased from 3.4-4.2% (P = .025). The rate of all major surgical complications or hospital reoperations did not change significantly after the date of the FDA communication (P = .177 and P = .593, respectively). The median risk-adjusted total episode cost for readmissions was $5847 (interquartile range $5478-10,389).

Conclusion

Following the April 2014 FDA safety communication regarding power morcellation, utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy decreased, and major surgical, nontransfusion complications and 30-day hospital readmissions increased.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : hysterectomy, morcellation, postoperative complications


Plan


 Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database is funded by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network. Dr Harris is a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar at the University of Michigan. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network were not directly involved in study design, data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript preparation, or review. Any opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Harris JA, Swenson CW, Uppal S, et al. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:98.e1-13.


© 2016  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 214 - N° 1

P. 98.e1-98.e13 - janvier 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Minimal stimulation IVF vs conventional IVF: a randomized controlled trial
  • John J. Zhang, Zaher Merhi, Mingxue Yang, Daniel Bodri, Alejandro Chavez-Badiola, Sjoerd Repping, Madelon van Wely
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Solitomab, an EpCAM/CD3 bispecific antibody construct (BiTE), is highly active against primary uterine serous papillary carcinoma cell lines in vitro
  • Stefania Bellone, Jonathan Black, Diana P. English, Carlton L. Schwab, Salvatore Lopez, Emiliano Cocco, Elena Bonazzoli, Federica Predolini, Francesca Ferrari, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Masoud Azodi, Peter E. Schwartz, Alessandro D. Santin

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.