Bedding Material Affects Mechanical Thresholds, Heat Thresholds, and Texture Preference - 24/12/15

Abstract |
It has long been known that the bedding type on which animals are housed can affect breeding behavior and cage environment, yet little is known about its effects on evoked behavior responses or nonreflexive behaviors. C57BL/6 mice were housed for 2 weeks on 1 of 5 bedding types: aspen Sani-Chips (standard bedding for our institute), ALPHA-Dri, Cellu-Dri, Pure-o’Cel, or TEK-Fresh. Mice housed on aspen exhibited the lowest (most sensitive) mechanical thresholds and those on TEK-Fresh exhibited 3-fold higher thresholds. Although bedding type had no effect on responses to punctate or dynamic light touch stimuli, TEK-Fresh-housed animals exhibited greater responsiveness in a noxious needle assay than did those housed on the other bedding types. Heat sensitivity was also affected by bedding because animals housed on aspen exhibited the shortest (most sensitive) latencies to withdrawal, whereas those housed on TEK-Fresh had the longest (least sensitive) latencies to response. Slight differences between bedding types were also seen in a moderate cold temperature preference assay. A modified tactile conditioned place preference chamber assay revealed that animals preferred TEK-Fresh to aspen bedding. Bedding type had no effect in a nonreflexive wheel running assay. In both acute (2 day) and chronic (5 week) inflammation induced by injection of complete Freund's adjuvant in the hindpaw, mechanical thresholds were reduced in all groups regardless of bedding type, but TEK-Fresh and Pure-o’Cel groups exhibited a greater dynamic range between controls and inflamed cohorts than aspen-housed mice.
Perspective |
These findings indicate that the bedding type routinely used to house animals can markedly affect the dynamic range of mechanical and heat behavior assays under normal and tissue injury conditions. Among beddings tested, TEK-Fresh bedding resulted in the least sensitive baseline thresholds for mechanical and thermal stimuli and the greatest dynamic range after tissue injury. Therefore, selection of routine cage bedding material should be carefully considered for animals that will be tested in behavioral somatosensory assays.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Bedding material affected evoked baseline behavioral mechanical and heat thresholds. |
• | Bedding affected the dynamic range of mechanical thresholds after acute CFA inflammation. |
• | Chronic CFA revealed the effects of bedding on mechanical and heat thresholds. |
• | Nonreflexive ongoing behaviors were unaffected by bedding materials. |
Key words : Mechanical behavior, mechanotransduction, bedding, cold behavior, chronic inflammation, acute inflammation, tactile place preference, wheel running
Plan
| The research reported in this manuscript was supported by NIH grants NS040538 and NS070711 to C.L.S. Partial support for this work was provided by the Research and Education Component of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment at the Medical College of Wisconsin. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. |
Vol 17 - N° 1
P. 50-64 - janvier 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
