S'abonner

Reference Ranges of Left Ventricular Strain Measures by Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - 02/03/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.echo.2015.11.016 
Philip T. Levy, MD a, b, ⁎ , Aliza Machefsky, BA a, Aura A. Sanchez c : MD, Meghna D. Patel, MD a, Sarah Rogal, MS b, Susan Fowler, MLIS a, Lauren Yaeger, MLIS a, Angela Hardi, MLIS a, Mark R. Holland, PhD d, Aaron Hamvas, MD e, Gautam K. Singh, MD a
a Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 
b Department of Pediatrics, Goryeb Children’s Hospital, Morristown, New Jersey 
c Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
d Department of Radiology, Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 
e Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 

∗Reprint requests: Philip T. Levy, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, One Children’s Place, Campus Box 8116-NWT, St. Louis, MO 63132.Washington University School of MedicineDepartment of PediatricsOne Children’s PlaceCampus Box 8116-NWTSt. LouisMO63132

Abstract

Background

Establishment of the range of reference values and associated variations of two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE)–derived left ventricular (LV) strain is a prerequisite for its routine clinical adoption in pediatrics. The aims of this study were to perform a meta-analysis of normal ranges of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS) measurements derived by 2DSTE in children and to identify confounding factors that may contribute to variance in reported measures.

Methods

A systematic review was launched in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library. Search hedges were created to cover the concepts of pediatrics, STE, and left-heart ventricle. Two investigators independently identified and included studies if they reported 2DSTE-derived LV GLS, GCS, or GRS. The weighted mean was estimated by using random effects models with 95% CIs, heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic and the inconsistency index (I2), and publication bias was evaluated using the Egger test. Effects of demographic (age), clinical, and vendor variables were assessed in a metaregression.

Results

The search identified 2,325 children from 43 data sets. The reported normal mean values of GLS among the studies varied from −16.7% to −23.6% (mean, −20.2%; 95% CI, −19.5% to −20.8%), GCS varied from −12.9% to −31.4% (mean, −22.3%; 95% CI, −19.9% to −24.6%), and GRS varied from 33.9% to 54.5% (mean, 45.2%; 95% CI, 38.3% to 51.7%). Twenty-six studies reported longitudinal strain only from the apical four-chamber view, with a mean of −20.4% (95% CI, −19.8% to −21.7%). Twenty-three studies reported circumferential strain (mean, −20.3%; 95% CI, −19.4% to −21.2%) and radial strain (mean, 46.7%; 95% CI, 42.3% to 51.1%) from the short-axis view at the midventricular level. A significant apex-to-base segmental longitudinal strain gradient (P < .01) was observed in the LV free wall. There was significant between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency (I2 > 94% and P < .001 for each strain measure), which was not explained by age, gender, body surface area, blood pressure, heart rate, frame rate, frame rate/heart rate ratio, tissue-tracking methodology, location of reported strain value along the strain curve, ultrasound equipment, or software. The metaregression showed that these effects were not significant determinants of variations among normal ranges of strain values. There was no evidence of publication bias (P = .40).

Conclusions

This study defines reference values of 2DSTE-derived LV strain in children on the basis of a meta-analysis. In healthy children, mean LV GLS was –20.2% (95% CI, −19.5% to −20.8%), mean GCS was −22.3% (95% CI, −19.9% to −24.6%), and mean GRS was 45.2% (95% CI, 38.3% to 51.7%). LV segmental longitudinal strain has a stable apex-to-base gradient that is preserved throughout maturation. Although variations among different reference ranges in this meta-analysis were not dependent on differences in demographic, clinical, or vendor parameters, age- and vendor-specific referenced ranges were established as well.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

•
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to establish the range of reference values of 2DSTE-derived LV strain is children.
•
The search identified 2,325 children from 43 data sets.
•
Mean LV GLS value was −20.2%, mean GCS was −22.3%, and mean GRS was 45.2%. LV strain did not vary by age.
•
LV SLS has a stable apex-to-base gradient that is preserved throughout maturation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Left ventricle, Cardiac function, Global strain, Speckle-tracking echocardiography, Children

Abbreviations : BSA, CS, ESS, FR, GCS, GLS, GLSr, GRS, HR, LS, LV, RS, RV, SLS, 2DSTE


Plan


 This study was supported by grants from Premature and Respiratory Outcomes Program (NIH 1U01 HL1014650, U01 HL101794).


© 2016  American Society of Echocardiography. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 29 - N° 3

P. 209 - mars 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Do Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria Really Matter?
  • John M. Dent
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Patterns of Mechanical Inefficiency in Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Their Relation to Left Ventricular Function and Clinical Outcomes
  • Daniel Forsha, Cameron Slorach, Ching Kit Chen, Ashley Sherman, Luc Mertens, Piers Barker, Joseph Kisslo, Mark K. Friedberg

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.