Patient preference for the pre-anesthesia evaluation: Telephone versus in-office assessment - 14/05/16

Abstract |
Study objective |
Pre-anesthesia evaluation (PAE) is designed to reduce patient and family anxiety, identify pre-existing health issues, avoid surgical delays, minimize costs, and tailor an anesthetic plan. If PAE requires a clinic visit, patients must take time off work and may incur travel and childcare costs. A telephone-based Preoperative Assessment Clinic can minimize patient inconvenience, while maintaining high-quality patient care and improving efficiency. We assessed patient satisfaction with a telephone PAE and determined whether patients preferred a telephone PAE or a conventional clinic visit.
Design |
Prospective, institutional review board–approved study.
Setting |
University hospital.
Patients |
We conducted an IRB-approved telephone survey of 75 adult, post-operative patients.
Interventions |
Telephone survey.
Measurements |
Patients were asked about their preference for a telephone PAE over an in-person evaluation. Survey questions included assessment of patient satisfaction with their anesthesia evaluation, operation, and anesthetic delivered. Delays and day of surgery cancellations were reviewed.
Main results |
The majority (97%) of patients stated they preferred a telephone PAE. Patient satisfaction was unaffected by driving distance (30±54 mi), ASA physical status or duration of surgery (169±159 min). Even patients who were not satisfied with their anesthetic (N=5) still preferred the telephone-based PAE. No increase in surgical delays or cancellation was noted.
Conclusion |
The majority of patients in this survey preferred a telephone PAE. Given the large catchment area of our hospital of nine counties, telephone-based interviews add to patient convenience and likely increase compliance with the PAE. Even patients who live in close proximity to our hospital (<5 mi) preferred a telephone assessment. A telephone-based PAE provides high patient satisfaction over a traditional office visit while increasing patient convenience. Larger studies are necessary to ensure that telephone PAEs compare well with in-person examinations.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Patients are satisfied with a telephone interview for their pre-anesthesia visit. |
• | Satisfaction was not affected by complications or distance to the hospital. |
• | Telephone interviews instead of office visits require fewer resources. |
Keywords : Pre-anesthesia evaluation, Patient satisfaction, Survey, Surgery cancellation
Plan
| ☆ | Attestation: All authors approved the final manuscript and participated in the design, or conduct and/or review of the manuscript. |
| ☆☆ | Funding: Not applicable. |
| ★ | Did a Section Editor solicit this submission? Name: IRB: Study approved by: Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 4.500 Rebecca Sealy, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555–0158, Main Line: (409) 266–9475, Fax: (409) 266–9499, Mail Route: 0158. |
| ★★ | Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors report no conflict of interest. |
Vol 31
P. 145-148 - juin 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
