Factors associated with biopsy site identification, postponement of surgery, and patient confidence in a dermatologic surgery practice - 15/05/16
Abstract |
Background |
Biopsy site identification is critical to avoid wrong-site surgery and may impact patient-centered outcomes.
Objective |
We sought to evaluate risk factors for biopsy site misidentification, postponement of surgery, and patient confidence in surgical site selection and to assess the near-miss rate for wrong-site surgeries.
Methods |
This was a prospective observational cohort study.
Results |
Near-miss wrong-site surgeries were detected and averted in 1.3% (3 of 239) of patients with biopsy site photographs. Risk factors for biopsy site misidentification by patients were 6 weeks or longer between biopsy and surgery (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-4.27; P = .028) and patient inability to see biopsy site (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.50-10.37; P = .002). Risk factors for physician misidentification were 6 or more weeks between biopsy and surgery (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.40-9.66; P = .007) and biopsy specimens from multiple sites (OR 4.39, 95% CI 1.67-11.54; P = .003). Postponement of surgery was associated with absence of a biopsy site photograph (OR 12.5, 95% CI 2.79-62.21; P < .001). Patient confidence in surgical site identification was associated with the presence of a biopsy site photograph (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.96-15.30; P = .001).
Limitations |
This was a single-site observational study.
Conclusion |
Biopsy site photography is associated with reduced rates of postponed surgeries and improved rates of patient confidence in surgical site selection. Risk factors for biopsy site misidentification should be considered before definitive treatment.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : biopsy, excision, identification, Mohs, photograph, skin cancer, wrong-site surgery
Plan
Supported by a Dermatology Foundation Clinical Career Development Award in Dermatologic Surgery (Dr Sobanko). |
|
Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 74 - N° 6
P. 1185-1193 - juin 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?