S'abonner

The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States - 27/05/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.023 
Sarah E. Little, MD, MPH a, , E. John Orav, PhD b, d, Julian N. Robinson, MD a, Aaron B. Caughey, MD, PhD e, Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH b, c
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
b Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
c Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
d Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 

Corresponding author: Sarah E. Little, MD, MPH.

Abstract

Background

Cesarean delivery rates vary widely across the United States. Health care usage in many other areas of medicine also varies widely across the United States; it is unknown whether the variation in cesarean delivery rates across US communities is correlated with this broader underlying variation in health care usage patterns.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the variation in cesarean delivery rates across US communities is correlated with other measures of health care usage in that community.

Study Design

We performed a population-based observational study that combined multiple national data sources, which included 2010 birth certificate data and Medicare claims data. Cesarean delivery rates in each US community, as defined by the Hospital Service Area, Medicare total spending per beneficiary, and hospital days in the last 6 months were calculated. Cesarean delivery and Medicare spending were on different patient populations; the Medicare variables were used to characterize the broader health care usage and spending pattern of that community. We examined the relationship between a community’s cesarean delivery rates and these measures of health care usage using Pearson correlation coefficients. We also stratified by quartile of Medicare spending and hospital use in the last 6 months of life and calculated the cesarean delivery rates per quartile, adjusting for underlying differences in patient characteristics, demographics, hospital structure, and the malpractice environment using a least-squared means method. We compared the amount of variation in cesarean delivery rates across communities that could be explained by differences in health care usage patterns to the amount of variation that was explained by other factors using the R-squared from multivariable models.

Results

Cesarean delivery rates varied from 4-65% across communities in the United States. Cesarean delivery rates were correlated positively with total Medicare spending (r = 0.48; P < .001) and hospital use in the last 6 months of life (r = 0.45; P < .001). Similar variation was seen in nulliparous women with a term fetus in vertex presentation (nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean deliveries), which is a common subset used for analysis of cesarean delivery rates. Communities in the lowest quartile of Medicare spending had the lowest rates of cesarean delivery (29.1% vs 35.7% in the highest quartile; P < .001 for differences across quartiles), which is a difference that persisted after adjustment (29.5% vs 31.8%; P < .001). Similar results were seen for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean deliveries and when data were stratified by hospital days in the last 6 months of life. Overall, 28.6% of the total variation in cesarean delivery rates was explained by differences in health care usage patterns, as compared with 16.6% by differences in obstetric procedures, 7.9% by hospital structure, and 2.3% by variations in the malpractice environment. Of the 56.3% of variation that was unexplained by differences in patient characteristics and area demographics, 8.2% could be accounted for by differences in health care usage patterns, as compared with 4.6% by differences in obstetric procedures, 2.1% by hospital structure, and 1.2% by variation in the malpractice environment.

Conclusion

Cesarean delivery rates vary widely across US communities; this variation is correlated broadly with the variation that is seen in other measures of health care usage across US communities.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : cesarean delivery, health care, usage patterns


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Little SE, Orav EJ, Robinson JN, et al. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:735.e1-8.


© 2016  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 214 - N° 6

P. 735.e1-735.e8 - juin 2016 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence
  • Hanna Jangö, Jens Langhoff-Roos, Susanne Rosthøj, Abelone Sakse
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pharmacokinetics and placental transfer of magnesium sulfate in pregnant women
  • Kathleen F. Brookfield, Felice Su, Mohammed H. Elkomy, David R. Drover, Deirdre J. Lyell, Brendan Carvalho

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.