Shock complicating type A acute aortic dissection: Clinical correlates, management, and outcomes - 06/06/16
, Reed E. Pyeritz, MD, PhD b, Alan C. Braverman, MD c, Mark D. Peterson, MD, PhD d, Marek Ehrlich, MD e, Patrick O'Gara, MD f, Toru Suzuki, MD, PhD g, Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD h, Dan Gilon, MD i, Kevin Greason, MD j, Nimesh D. Desai, MD k, Daniel G. Montgomery, BS l, Eric M. Isselbacher, MD m, Christoph A. Nienaber, MD n, Kim A. Eagle, MD lon behalf of
IRAD Investigators
Résumé |
Aims |
Shock is among the most dreaded and common complications of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). However, clinical correlates, management, and short- and long-term outcomes of TAAAD patients presenting with shock in real-world clinical practice are not known.
Methods and Results |
We evaluated 2,704 patients with TAAAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between January 1, 1996, and August 18, 2012. On admission, 407 (15.1%) TAAAD patients presented with shock. Most in-hospital complications (coma, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia or infarction, and cardiac tamponade) were more frequent in shock patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in TAAAD patients with than without shock (30.2% vs 23.9%, P=.007), regardless of surgical or medical treatment. Most shock patients underwent surgical repair, with medically managed patients demonstrating older age and more complications at presentation. Estimates using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that most (89%) TAAAD patients with shock discharged alive from the hospital survived 5years, a rate similar to that of TAAAD patients without shock (82%, P=.609).
Conclusions |
Shock occurred in 1 of 7 TAAAD patients and was associated with higher rates of in-hospital adverse events and mortality. However, TAAAD survivors with or without shock showed similar long-term mortality. Successful early and aggressive management of shock in TAAAD patients has the potential for improving long-term survival in this patient population.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Conflict of interest disclosures: None. |
Vol 176
P. 93-99 - juin 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
