A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis - 21/06/16
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
It is not possible to accurately count adenomas in many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Nevertheless, polyp counts are critical in evaluating each patient’s response to interventions. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recognizes the decrease in polyp burden as a sufficient chemoprevention trial treatment endpoint requiring a measure of “clinical benefit.” To develop endpoints for future industry-sponsored chemopreventive trials, the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSIGHT) developed an FAP staging and intervention classification scheme for lower-GI tract polyposis.
Methods |
Twenty-four colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy videos were reviewed by 26 clinicians familiar with diagnosis and treatment of FAP. The reviewers independently assigned a stage to a case by using the proposed system and chose a stage-specific intervention for each case. Our endpoint was the degree of concordance among reviewers staging and intervention assessments.
Results |
The staging and intervention ratings of the 26 reviewers were highly concordant (ρ = 0.710; 95% credible interval, 0.651-0.759). Sixty-two percent of reviewers agreed on the FAP stage, and 90% of scores were within ±1 stage of the mode. Sixty percent of reviewers agreed on the intervention, and 86% chose an intervention within ±1 level of the mode.
Conclusions |
The proposed FAP colon polyposis staging system and stage-specific intervention are based on a high degree of agreement on the part of experts in the review of individual cases of polyposis. Therefore, reliable and clinically relevant means for measuring trial outcomes can be developed. Outlier cases showing wide scatter in stage assignment call for individualized attention and may be inappropriate for enrollment in clinical trials for this reason.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : FAP, FDA, InSiGHT, ICC, IPSS
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: Dr Burt is a consultant for Myriad Genetics. Each video reviewer received compensation for the time devoted to review of endoscopic videos and for completing the scoring forms. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Support for this study was provided by SLA Pharma (UK) Ltd. The protocol number for this study at MD Anderson Cancer Center is PA11-0926. |
|
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Lynch at plynch@mdanderson.org. |
Vol 84 - N° 1
P. 115 - juillet 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
