Hemodynamic Response After Rapid Sequence Induction With Ketamine in Out-of-Hospital Patients at Risk of Shock as Defined by the Shock Index - 21/07/16
, Natalie Kruit, MBBS (Hons) c, Charlotte Heldreich, MBChB (Bris), DipRTM d, Sandra Ware, BSc MSc (Med) a, e, Karel Habig, MBBS BSc, Dip RTM (Edin) a, f, Cliff Reid, BM a, f, Brian Burns, MBBCh MSc a, fAbstract |
Study objective |
Ketamine is considered a stable induction agent for rapid sequence induction; however, hypotension rates up to 24% are reported. The shock index (shock index=pulse rate/systolic blood pressure [SBP]) may identify patients at risk of adverse hemodynamic change. We investigate whether SBP and pulse rate response to ketamine induction differ when patients are classified as being at risk of shock by their shock index.
Methods |
We conducted a prospective observational study of electronically collected vital sign data from patients undergoing rapid sequence induction with ketamine. Patients were grouped into low shock index (shock index <0.9) or high shock index (shock index ≥0.9) preinduction. Pulse rate and SBP were compared between 3 minutes preinduction and for 3 measurements postinduction (3-minute intervals) by repeated-measures ANOVA. Proportions of patients developing hypotension or hypertension are also reported.
Results |
One hundred twelve patients were enrolled (81 low shock index, 31 high shock index). Low shock index patients had increased SBP after induction (16 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11 to 21 mm Hg), whereas high shock index patients did not (2 mm Hg; 95% CI –4 to 7 mm Hg). Pulse rate in low shock index patients increased after induction (20 beats/min; 95% CI 16 to 25 beats/min) and remained elevated, whereas in high shock index patients a difference occurred at the second postinduction measurement only (15 beats/min; 95% CI 11 to 18 beats/min). More high shock index patients became hypotensive (26%; 95% CI 12% to 45%) than low shock index ones (2%; 95% CI 0% to 9%), whereas more low shock index patients became hypertensive (40%; 95% CI 29% to 51%) than high shock index ones (13%; 95% CI 4% to 30%).
Conclusion |
After ketamine induction, high shock index patients exhibited blunted hypertensive responses and more frequent hypotension, whereas low shock index patients had sustained increases in pulse rate and SBP.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Please see page 182 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
| Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD |
|
| Author contributions: MM, NK, CH, SW, CR, and BB conceived and planned the study. MM, NK, and SW designed the study and analysis. KH contributed to data collection. MM was responsible for ethical and site-specific approvals. MM and SW provided statistical analysis. MM drafted the article, and all authors contributed to its revision. MM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. |
|
| A HM33JTQ survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
| A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 68 - N° 2
P. 181 - août 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
