To reveal differences or advantages in regard to different treatment options after proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma.

Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series.

All patients receiving intravitreal treatment between January 2011 and July 2014 for radiation maculopathy after proton beam therapy were included. Excluded were all patients who required re-irradiation, vitrectomies, or tumor resections; and those whose treatment was performed for potentially other reasons, such as radiation-induced optic neuropathy, or where visual outcome was influenced by tumor growth under the macula or macular ischemia. Minimum follow-up was 12 months after last injection.

Of 78 patients, 38 (48.7%) received bevacizumab injections, 35 (44.9%) triamcinolone acetonide injections, and 5 (6.4%) a dexamethasone implant. In the bevacizumab group visual acuity improved in 11 patients (28.9%) by 0.25 logMAR (0.1–0.4 logMAR) and remained stable in 24 patients (63.2%) 4 weeks after injection. In the triamcinolone group visual acuity showed improved outcomes in 10 patients (28.6%) by 0.25 logMAR (0.1–0.4 logMAR) and stability in function in 20 patients (57.1%). Four weeks after dexamethasone implantation visual acuity remained stable in 4 patients (80%). No differences among the groups were detected regarding functional outcome or reduction in central foveal thickness.

This study showed that antiangiogenic or corticosteroid intravitreal treatment led to reduced central foveal thickness and visual improvement in some patients without showing differences or advantages. Therefore a patient-specific treatment choice can be recommended.