Which DSM validated tools for diagnosing depression are usable in primary care research? A systematic literature review - 10/01/17
, J.Y. Le Reste a, ⁎ , M. Guillou-Landreat b, M.A. Munoz Perez c, S. Argyriadou d, A. Claveria e, M.I. Fernández San Martín c, S. Czachowski f, H. Lingner g, C. Lygidakis h, A. Sowinska i, B. Chiron a, J. Derriennic a, A. Le Prielec a, B. Le Floch a, T. Montier j, H. Van Marwijk k, P. Van Royen lBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 7 |
| Iconographies | 1 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Depression occurs frequently in primary care. Its broad clinical variability makes it difficult to diagnose. This makes it essential that family practitioner (FP) researchers have validated tools to minimize bias in studies of everyday practice. Which tools validated against psychiatric examination, according to the major depression criteria of DSM-IV or 5, can be used for research purposes?
Method |
An international FP team conducted a systematic review using the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase, from 2000/01/01 to 2015/10/01.
Results |
The three databases search identified 770 abstracts: 546 abstracts were analyzed after duplicates had been removed (224 duplicates); 50 of the validity studies were eligible and 4 studies were included. In 4 studies, the following tools were found: GDS-5, GDS-15, GDS-30, CESD-R, HADS, PSC-51 and HSCL-25. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value were collected. The Youden index was calculated.
Discussion |
Using efficiency data alone to compare these studies could be misleading. Additional reliability, reproducibility and ergonomic data will be essential for making comparisons.
Conclusion |
This study selected seven tools, usable in primary care research, for the diagnosis of depression. In order to define the best tools in terms of efficiency, reproducibility, reliability and ergonomics for research in primary care, and for care itself, further research will be essential.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Depression, Systematic review of literature, Diagnostic tool, Primary Care Research
Abbreviations : COSMIN, DSM, EGPRN, IMRaD, FP, NPV, PPV, PRISMA, Se, Sp
Plan
Vol 39
P. 99-105 - janvier 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Latent classes in diagnoses among psychiatric inpatients predicting mortality and imprisonment – a nationwide cohort study
- H.K. Carlsen, S. Steingrimsson, M.I. Sigurdsson, S. Sigfússon, A. Magnússon
- Risk factors for suicide in the Israeli army between the years 1992–2012: A case-control study
- L. Shelef, G. Tomer, L. Tatsa-Laur, R. Kedem, O. Bonne, E. Fruchter
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?