S'abonner

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions - 01/02/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013 
L. Li a , R. Roth a , P. Germaine b , S. Ren c , M. Lee a , K. Hunter e , E. Tinney d , L. Liao f,
a Department of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, 900 Centennial Blvd., Building 1, Suite B, Voorhees, NJ 08043, USA 
b Department of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08013, USA 
c Department of Pathology, Cooper University Hospital, , One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08013, USA 
d Cooper University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 900 Centennial Blvd., Building 1, Suite B, Voorhees, NJ 08043, USA 
e Cooper Medical School of Rowan University; Statistician II, Cooper Research Institute, Cooper University Hospital, 401 Haddon Ave., Room 140, Camden, NJ 08103, USA 
f Cooper Breast Imaging Center, Cooper University Hospital, 900 Centennial Blvd., Building 1, Suite B, Voorhees, NJ 08043, USA 

Corresponding author. Cooper Breast Imaging Centers (CBIC), Anderson Cancer Center, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 900 Centennial Blvd., Building 1, Suite B, Voorhees, NJ 08043, USA.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with that of breast magnetic resonance imaging (BMRI) in breast cancer detection using parameters, including sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), lesion size, morphology, lesion and background enhancement, and examination time.

Materials and methods

A total of 48 women (mean age, 56years±10.6 [SD]) with breast lesions detected between October 2012 and March 2014 were included. Both CESM and BMRI were performed for each patient within 30 days. The enhancement intensity of lesions and breast background parenchyma was subjectively assessed for both modalities and was quantified for comparison. Statistical significance was analyzed using paired t-test for mean size of index lesions in all malignant breasts (an index lesion defined as the largest lesion in each breast), and a mean score of enhancement intensity for index lesions and breast background. PPV, sensitivity, and accuracy were calculated for both CESM and BMRI. The average duration time of CESM and MRI examinations was also compared.

Results

A total of 66 lesions were identified, including 62 malignant and 4 benign lesions. Both CESM and BMRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% for detection of breast cancer. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean size of index lesions (P=0.108). The enhancement intensity of breast background was significantly lower for CESM than for BMRI (P<0.01). The mean score of enhancement intensity of index lesions on CESM was significantly less than that for BMRI (P<0.01). The smallest lesion that was detected by both modalities measured 4mm. CESM had a higher PPV than BMRI (P>0.05). The average examination time for CESM was significantly shorter than that of BMRI (P<0.01).

Conclusion

CESM has similar sensitivity than BMRI in breast cancer detection, with higher PPV and less background enhancement. CESM is associate with significantly shorter exam time thus a more accessible alternative to BMRI, and has the potential to play an important tool in breast cancer detection and staging.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Breast cancer diagnosis, Comparative studies


Plan


© 2016  Éditions françaises de radiologie. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 98 - N° 2

P. 113-123 - février 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Postmortem computed tomography findings in suicide victims
  • M. Garetier, L. Deloire, F. Dédouit, E. Dumousset, C. Saccardy, D. Ben Salem
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Usefulness of T2 ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac MR imaging
  • F. Legou, V. Tacher, T. Damy, V. Planté-Bordeneuve, S. Rappeneau, N. Benhaiem, J. Rosso, E. Itti, A. Luciani, H. Kobeiter, A. Rahmouni, J.-F. Deux

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.