Late side-effects and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: 5-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial - 15/03/17
, Oliver J Ott, MD b, Guido Hildebrandt, ProfMD c, d, Daniela Kauer-Dorner, MD e, Hellen Knauerhase, MD d, Tibor Major, PhD a, Jaroslaw Lyczek, MD f, g, José Luis Guinot, MD h, Jürgen Dunst, ProfMD i, Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez, ProfMD k, Pavel Slampa, ProfMD l, Michael Allgäuer, MD n, Kristina Lössl, MD m, Bülent Polat, MD q, György Kovács, ProfMD o, Arnt-René Fischedick, ProfMD p, Rainer Fietkau, ProfMD b, d, Alexandra Resch, MD e, Anna Kulik, MD f, Leo Arribas, ProfMD h, Peter Niehoff, ProfMD i, j, Ferran Guedea, ProfMD k, Annika Schlamann, MD c, Richard Pötter, ProfMD e, Christine Gall, DSc r, Wolfgang Uter, ProfMD r, Vratislav Strnad, ProfMD bon behalf of the
Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO)
Summary |
Background |
We previously confirmed the non-inferiority of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with interstitial brachytherapy in terms of local control and overall survival compared with whole-breast irradiation for patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery in a phase 3 randomised trial. Here, we present the 5-year late side-effects and cosmetic results of the trial.
Methods |
We did this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial at 16 centres in seven European countries. Women aged 40 years or older with stage 0–IIA breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery with microscopically clear resection margins of at least 2 mm were randomly assigned 1:1, via an online interface, to receive either whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy with a tumour-bed boost of 10 Gy or APBI with interstitial brachytherapy. Randomisation was stratified by study centre, menopausal status, and tumour type (invasive carcinoma vs ductal carcinoma in situ), with a block size of ten, according to an automated dynamic algorithm. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint of our initial analysis was ipsilateral local recurrence; here, we report the secondary endpoints of late side-effects and cosmesis. We analysed physician-scored late toxicities and patient-scored and physician-scored cosmetic results from the date of breast-conserving surgery to the date of onset of event. Analysis was done according to treatment received (as-treated population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00402519.
Findings |
Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, we randomly assigned 1328 women to receive either whole-breast irradiation (n=673) or APBI with interstitial brachytherapy (n=655); 1184 patients comprised the as-treated population (551 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 633 in the APBI group). At a median follow-up of 6·6 years (IQR 5·8–7·6), no patients had any grade 4 toxities, and three (<1%) of 484 patients in the APBI group and seven (2%) of 393 in the whole-breast irradiation group had grade 3 late skin toxicity (p=0·16). No patients in the APBI group and two (<1%) in the whole-breast irradiation group developed grade 3 late subcutaneous tissue toxicity (p=0·10). The cumulative incidence of any late side-effect of grade 2 or worse at 5 years was 27·0% (95% CI 23·0–30·9) in the whole-breast irradiation group versus 23·3% (19·9–26·8) in the APBI group (p=0·12). The cumulative incidence of grade 2–3 late skin toxicity at 5 years was 10·7% (95% CI 8·0–13·4) in the whole-breast irradiation group versus 6·9% (4·8–9·0) in the APBI group (difference −3·8%, 95% CI −7·2 to 0·4; p=0·020). The cumulative risk of grade 2–3 late subcutaneous tissue side-effects at 5 years was 9·7% (95% CI 7·1–12·3) in the whole-breast irradiation group versus 12·0% (9·4–14·7) in the APBI group (difference 2·4%; 95% CI −1·4 to 6·1; p=0·28). The cumulative incidence of grade 2–3 breast pain was 11·9% (95% CI 9·0–14·7) after whole-breast irradiation versus 8·4% (6·1–10·6) after APBI (difference −3·5%; 95% CI −7·1 to 0·1; p=0·074). At 5 years’ follow-up, according to the patients’ view, 413 (91%) of 454 patients had excellent to good cosmetic results in the whole-breast irradiation group versus 498 (92%) of 541 patients in the APBI group (p=0·62); when judged by the physicians, 408 (90%) of 454 patients and 503 (93%) of 542 patients, respectively, had excellent to good cosmetic results (p=0·12). No treatment-related deaths occurred, but six (15%) of 41 patients (three in each group) died from breast cancer, and 35 (85%) deaths (21 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 14 in the APBI group) were unrelated.
Interpretation |
5-year toxicity profiles and cosmetic results were similar in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by either APBI with interstitial brachytherapy or conventional whole-breast irradiation, with significantly fewer grade 2–3 late skin side-effects after APBI with interstitial brachytherapy. These findings provide further clinical evidence for the routine use of interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy-based APBI in the treatment of patients with low-risk breast cancer who opt for breast conservation.
Funding |
German Cancer Aid.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 18 - N° 2
P. 259-268 - février 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
- Rieky E G Dikmans, Vera L Negenborn, Mark-Bram Bouman, Hay A H Winters, Jos W R Twisk, P Quinten Ruhé, Marc A M Mureau, Jan Maerten Smit, Stefania Tuinder, Yassir Eltahir, Nicole A Posch, Josephina M van Steveninck-Barends, Marleen A Meesters-Caberg, René R W J van der Hulst, Marco J P F Ritt, Margriet G Mullender
- Recommendations for gonadotoxicity surveillance in male childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup Consortium
- Roderick Skinner, Renee L Mulder, Leontien C Kremer, Melissa M Hudson, Louis S Constine, Edit Bardi, Annelies Boekhout, Anja Borgmann-Staudt, Morven C Brown, Richard Cohn, Uta Dirksen, Alexsander Giwercman, Hiroyuki Ishiguro, Kirsi Jahnukainen, Lisa B Kenney, Jacqueline J Loonen, Lilian Meacham, Sebastian Neggers, Stephen Nussey, Cecilia Petersen, Margarett Shnorhavorian, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Hanneke M van Santen, William H B Wallace, Daniel M Green
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?