Pediatric Concussion Management in the Emergency Department: A National Survey of Parents - 18/04/17
, Sarah J. Clark, MPH 2, 3, Alexander J. Rogers, MD 2, 4, Helena Wang-Flores, DO 2, 4, Rachel M. Stanley, MD, MHSA 5Abstract |
Objective |
To examine parental expectations and beliefs about diagnosis and management of pediatric concussion.
Study design |
We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of a nationally representative panel of US parents in March 2014. Parents of 10- to 17-year-old children responded to questions about their expectations and beliefs about diagnosis and management of pediatric concussion in the emergency department (ED). Weighted percentages for descriptive statistics were calculated, and χ2 statistics were used for bivariate analysis.
Results |
Survey participation was 53%, and of 912 parent respondents with a child 10-17 years of age who were presented with a scenario of their child having mild symptoms of concussion, 42% would seek immediate ED care. Parents who would seek immediate ED care for this scenario were more likely than parents who would consult their child's usual provider or wait at home to “definitely expect” imaging (65% vs 21%), definitive diagnosis of concussion (77% vs 61%), a timeline for return to activity (80% vs 60%), and a signed return to play form (55% vs 41%).
Conclusions |
Many parents who bring children to the ED following a possible concussion are likely to expect comprehensive and definitive care, including imaging, a definitive diagnosis, a timeline for return to activity, and a signed return to play form. To manage these expectations, healthcare providers should continue to educate parents about the evaluation and management of concussion.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : pediatric concussion, parental expectations, beliefs, management
Abbreviations : CT, ED, NPCH, TBI
Plan
| The C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health is funded by the University of Michigan Health System. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 181
P. 229-234 - février 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
