S'abonner

Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial - 29/07/17

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30340-6 
Prue C Allgood, PhD a, Roberta Maroni, MSc a, Sue Hudson, MSc b, Judith Offman, PhD a, Anne E Turnbull, FRCR c, Lesley Peacock, BSc d, Jim Steel, FRCR e, Geraldine Kirby, BA f, Christine E Ingram, MA g, Julie Somers, PGDip h, Clare Fuller, MSc h, Anthony G Threlfall, PhD i, Rhian Gabe, PhD j, Anthony J Maxwell, FRCR k, l, Julietta Patnick, ProfFFPH m, Stephen W Duffy, ProfMSc a,
a Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK 
b Peel and Schriek Consulting, London, UK 
c Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Southern Derbyshire Breast Screening Service, Derby, UK 
d Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Castle Hill Hospital, Humberside Breast Screening Service, Cottingham, UK 
e Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Primrose Breast Care Centre, Plymouth, UK 
f South East London Breast Screening Programme, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
g Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Breast Screening Unit, Sheffield, UK 
h West of London Breast Screening Service, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK 
i Theorize, Manchester, UK 
j Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK 
k Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
l Nightingale Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK 
m Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Stephen W Duffy, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK Centre for Cancer Prevention Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London EC1M 6BQ UK

Summary

Background

In England, participation in breast cancer screening has been decreasing in the past 10 years, approaching the national minimum standard of 70%. Interventions aimed at improving participation need to be investigated and put into practice to stop this downward trend. We assessed the effect on participation of sending invitations for breast screening with a timed appointment to women who did not attend their first offered appointment within the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP).

Methods

In this open, randomised controlled trial, women in six centres in the NHSBSP in England who were invited for routine breast cancer screening were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an invitation to a second appointment with fixed date and time (intervention) or an invitation letter with a telephone number to call to book their new screening appointment (control) in the event of non-attendance at the first offered appointment. Randomisation was by SX number, a sequential unique identifier of each woman within the NHSBSP, and at the beginning of the study a coin toss decided whether women with odd or even SX numbers would be allocated to the intervention group. Women aged 50–70 years who did not attend their first offered appointment were eligible for the analysis. The primary endpoint was participation (ie, attendance at breast cancer screening) within 90 days of the date of the first offered appointment; we used Poisson regression to compare the proportion of women who participated in screening in the study groups. All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with Barts Health, number 009304QM.

Findings

We obtained 33 146 records of women invited for breast cancer screening at the six centres between June 2, 2014, and Sept 30, 2015, who did not attend their first offered appointment. 26 054 women were eligible for this analysis (12 807 in the intervention group and 13 247 in the control group). Participation within 90 days of the first offered appointment was significantly higher in the intervention group (2861 [22%] of 12 807) than in the control group (1632 [12%] of 13 247); relative risk of participation 1·81 (95% CI 1·70–1·93; p<0·0001).

Interpretation

These findings show that a policy of second appointments with fixed date and time for non-attenders of breast screening is effective in improving participation. This strategy can be easily implemented by the screening sites and, if combined with simple interventions, could further increase participation and ensure an upward shift in the participation trend nationally. Whether the policy should vary by time since last attended screen will have to be considered.

Funding

National Health Service Cancer Screening Programmes and Department of Health Policy Research Programme.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2017  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 18 - N° 7

P. 972-980 - juillet 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Novel molecular subgroups for clinical classification and outcome prediction in childhood medulloblastoma: a cohort study
  • Edward C Schwalbe, Janet C Lindsey, Sirintra Nakjang, Stephen Crosier, Amanda J Smith, Debbie Hicks, Gholamreza Rafiee, Rebecca M Hill, Alice Iliasova, Thomas Stone, Barry Pizer, Antony Michalski, Abhijit Joshi, Stephen B Wharton, Thomas S Jacques, Simon Bailey, Daniel Williamson, Steven C Clifford
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Radiotherapy in patients with HIV: current issues and review of the literature
  • Filippo Alongi, Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Savino Sciascia, Alessandra Fozza, Sergio Fersino, Alba Fiorentino, Rosario Mazzola, Francesco Ricchetti, Michela Buglione, Dora Buonfrate, Dario Roccatello, Umberto Ricardi, Zeno Bisoffi

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.