A laboratory association between hemoglobin and VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 27/09/17

, Dirk Sibbing c, Adnan Kastrati d, Young-Guk Ko e, Yangsoo Jang e, Young-Seok Cho b, Tae-Jin Youn b, In-Ho Chae b, Dong-Ju Choi b, Hyo-Soo Kim fAbstract |
Background |
VerifyNow P2Y12 assay is used widely to evaluate residual platelet reactivity in patients taking P2Y12 receptor antagonists. However, a laboratory association between VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and hemoglobin, which might lead to wrong interpretation of the data, is reported. We performed these systematic review and meta-analysis to clearly define the relationship between PRU and hemoglobin and to elucidate whether the relationship, if any, is a true biological association or is just a laboratory error.
Methods |
Through a comprehensive electronic and manual search, 10 studies were selected for the cohort level meta-analysis. Among 10 studies, we were able to retrieve the raw data of 5 studies, and a patient-level meta-analysis was performed. Potential publication bias was searched by funnel plot analysis and was actively adjusted, if present, by trim and fill method.
Results |
The pooled analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between PRU and hemoglobin (r=−0.349; P<.001; 10 studies with 4,793 patients). VerifyNow P2Y12 base unit, which reflects off-drug platelet reactivity, was also inversely correlated with hemoglobin (r=−0.526; P<.001; 8 studies with 4,395 patients). % Inhibition (r=0.081; P=.059; 6 studies with 3,832 patients) and ΔPRU (r=−0.037; P=.188; 5 studies with 3,521 patients) were not associated with hemoglobin. A significant inverse association between PRU and hemoglobin was also observed in the patient-level meta-analysis (3,533 patients pooled from 5 studies; r=−0.335; P<.001). Light transmission aggregometry (r=0.160; P=.072; 4 studies with 1,144 patients) and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (r=−0.029; P=.394; 3 studies with 7,645 patients) showed no significant association with hemoglobin.
Conclusions |
A significant inverse association was observed between PRU and hemoglobin which is likely to be a laboratory error. Clinicians should be aware that this association might lead to wrong interpretation of the data.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the SNUBH Research Fund (04-2012-001); a grant from the Clinical Research Center for Ischemic Heart Disease, Seoul, Republic of Korea (0412-CR02-0704-0001); and a grant from the Innovative Research Institute for Cell Therapy, Seoul National University Hospital (A062260), sponsored by the Ministry of Health, Welfare & Family, Republic of Korea. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. |
Vol 188
P. 53-64 - juin 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
