S'abonner

Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system - 27/09/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036 
Michael R. Brunson, MD a, c, , David A. Klein, MD, MPH c, d, Cara H. Olsen, DrPH e, Larissa F. Weir, MD b, f, Timothy A. Roberts, MD, MPH a, c
a Department of Pediatrics, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 
b Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 
c Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 
d Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 
e Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 
f Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 

Corresponding author: Michael R. Brunson, MD.

Abstract

Background

Repeat pregnancies after a short interpregnancy interval are common and are associated with negative maternal and infant health outcomes. Few studies have examined the relative effectiveness of postpartum contraceptive choices.

Objective

We aimed to determine the initiation trends and relative effectiveness of postpartum contraceptive methods, with typical use, on prevention of short delivery intervals (≤27 months) among women with access to universal healthcare, including coverage that entails no co-payments and allows unlimited contraceptive method switching.

Study Design

This retrospective cohort study included women who were enrolled in the United States military healthcare system who were admitted for childbirth between October 2010 and March 2015, with ≥6 months postpartum enrollment. With the use of insurance records, we determined the most effective contraceptive method initiated during the first 6 months after delivery, even if subsequently discontinued. Rates of interdelivery intervals of ≤27 months, as proxies for interpregnancy intervals ≤18 months, were determined with the use of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Women who were disenrolled, who reached 27 months after delivery without another delivery, or who reached the end of the study period were censored. The influence of sociodemographic variables and contraceptive choices on time to subsequent delivery was evaluated by Cox regression analysis, which accounted for a possible correlation among multiple deliveries by an individual woman.

Results

During the study timeframe, 373,840 women experienced a total of 450,875 postpartum intervals. Women averaged 27 (standard deviation, 5.3) years of age at the time of delivery; 33.9% of them were <25 years old; 15.5% of them were active duty service members, and 31.6% of them had insurance sponsors of junior enlisted rank (which suggests lower income). Postpartum contraceptive methods that were initiated included self or partner sterilization (7%), intrauterine device (13.5%), etonogestrel implant (3.4%), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5%), and pill, patch, or ring (36.8%). Furthermore, 36.7% of them did not initiate a prescription method. Etonogestrel implant initiation increased from 1.7% of postpartum women in the first year of our study to 5.3% in the final year. The estimated short interdelivery interval rate was 17.4%, but rates varied with contraceptive method: 1% with sterilization, 6% with long-acting reversible contraception, 12% with depot medroxyprogesterone, 21% with pill, patch, or ring, and 23% with no prescription method. In a multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard of a short interdelivery interval was highest among women who were younger, on active duty, or with officer insurance sponsors. Compared with nonuse of any prescription contraceptive, the use of an intrauterine device reduced the hazard of a subsequent delivery (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.20), as did etonogestrel implant (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.23); the pill, patch, or ring had less effect (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.81).

Conclusion

Postpartum initiation of long-acting reversible contraception is highly effective at the prevention of short interdelivery intervals, whereas pill, patch, or ring methods are associated with rates of short interdelivery intervals similar to users of no prescription contraception. This study supports long-acting reversible contraception as first-line recommendations for postpartum women who wish to retain fertility but avoid early repeat pregnancy.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : effectiveness, implant, interdelivery interval, intrauterine device, LARC, long-acting reversible contraception, postpartum contraception


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 The view(s) expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the US Army Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense or the US Government.
 Cite this article as: Brunson MR, Klein DA, Olsen CH, et al. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:55.e1-9.


© 2017  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 217 - N° 1

P. 55.e1-55.e9 - juillet 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Assessment of serum HE4 levels throughout the normal menstrual cycle
  • Richard G. Moore, Beth Plante, Erin Hartnett, Jessica Mitchel, Christine A. Raker, Wendy Vitek, Elizabeth Eklund, Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Continuation of copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices: a retrospective cohort study
  • Sharon J. Phillips, Lisa G. Hofler, Anna M. Modest, Lara F.B. Harvey, Lily H. Wu, Michele R. Hacker

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.