S'abonner

New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns - 29/11/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.007 
Joshua I. Rosenbloom, MD, MPH , Molly J. Stout, MD, MSCI, Methodius G. Tuuli, MD, MPH, Candice L. Woolfolk, PhD, MPH, Julia D. López, MPH, LCSW, George A. Macones, MD, MSCE, Alison G. Cahill, MD, MSCI
 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 

Corresponding author: Joshua I. Rosenbloom, MD, MPH.

Abstract

Background

In 2010 the Consortium on Safe Labor published labor curves. It was proposed that the rate of cesarean delivery could be lowered by avoiding the diagnosis of arrest of dilation before 6 cm. However, there is little information on the uptake of the guidelines and on changes in cesarean delivery rates that may have occurred.

Objective

The objective of the study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) among patients laboring at term, rates of arrest of dilation disorders have decreased, leading to a decrease in the rate of cesarean delivery; (2) in the second stage, pushing duration prior to diagnosis of arrest of descent has increased, also leading to a reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery for this indication. As a secondary aim, we investigated changes in maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Study Design

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of all patients presenting at ≥37 weeks’ gestation from 2010 through 2014 with a nonanomalous vertex singleton and no prior history of cesarean delivery. Rates of cesarean delivery, arrest of dilation, and changes in rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity were calculated in crude and adjusted models. Cervical dilation at diagnosis of the arrest of dilation, time spent at the maximal dilation prior to diagnosis of arrest of dilation, and time in the second stage prior to the diagnosis of arrest of descent were compared over the study period.

Results

There were 7845 eligible patients. The cesarean delivery rate in 2010 was 15.8% and, in 2014, 17.7% (P trend = .51). In patients undergoing cesarean delivery for the arrest of dilation, the median cervical dilation at the time of cesarean delivery was at 5.5 cm in 2010 and 6.0 cm in 2014 (P trend = .94). In these patients, there was an increase in the time spent at last dilation: 3.8 hours in 2010 to 5.2 hours in 2014 (P trend = .02). There was no change in the frequency of patients diagnosed with the arrest of dilation at <6 cm: 51.4% in 2010 and 48.6% in 2014 (P trend = .56). However, in these patients, the median time spent at the last cervical dilation was 4.0 hours in 2010 and 6.7 hours in 2014 (P trend = .046). There were 206 cesarean deliveries for the arrest of descent. The median pushing time in these patients increased in multiparous patients from 1.1 hours in 2010 to 3.4 hours in 2014 (P trend = .009); in nulliparous patients these times were 2.7 hours in 2010 and 3.8 hours in 2014 (P trend = .09). There was a significant trend toward increasing adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes (P < .001 for each). The adjusted odds ratio for adverse maternal outcome for 2014 compared with 2010 was 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.27–2.17); however, considering only transfusion, hemorrhage, or infection, there was no difference (P trend = .96). The adjusted odds ratio of adverse neonatal outcome in 2014 compared with 2010 was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.36–2.36).

Conclusion

Despite significant changes in labor management that have occurred over the initial years since publication of the new labor curves and associated guidelines, the primary cesarean delivery rate was not reduced and there has been an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity in our institution. A randomized controlled trial is needed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : arrest of descent, arrest of dilation, cesarean delivery, guidelines, labor management, maternal morbidity, neonatal morbidity


Plan


 The views expressed herein are those of the authors, and the supporters of the study had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.
 This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01: HD 06161619-01A1).
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:689.e1-8.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 217 - N° 6

P. 689.e1-689.e8 - décembre 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Hydralazine vs nifedipine for acute hypertensive emergency in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
  • Chanderdeep Sharma, Anjali Soni, Amit Gupta, Ashok Verma, Suresh Verma
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory
  • Andrea K. Petersen, Sau Wai Cheung, Janice L. Smith, Weimin Bi, Patricia A. Ward, Sandra Peacock, Alicia Braxton, Ignatia B. Van Den Veyver, Amy M. Breman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.