Mending Gaps in Knowledge : Collaborations in Neurogenic Bladder Research - 14/12/17
, Darshan P. Patel, MD a, Sean P. Elliott, MD, MS b, John T. Stoffel, MD c, Blayne Welk, MD, MSc d, Amitabh Jha, MD, MPH e, Sara M. Lenherr, MD, MS aNeurogenic Bladder Research Group
Résumé |
Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments are essential to studying conditions such as neurogenic bladder in which multiple management strategies are approximately equally efficacious. Innovations for the treatment of neurogenic bladder need to be guided by both clinical and patient-reported outcomes that are rigorously tested via high-quality prospective cohort or randomized studies. Collaborative research groups in reconstructive urology are critical to the study of uncommon disease processes because they allow studies to be powered adequately, foster innovative treatment strategies through collaboration, and help moderate the risk of investigator and or institutional biases.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Neurogenic bladder, Spinal cord injury, Complication, Incontinence, Patient-reported outcomes
Plan
| Disclosures: Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers and J. Stoffel receive salary support and B. Welk and Amitabh Jha are paid consultants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER14092138). Drs S. Elliott, S. Lenherr, J.B. Myers, and J. Stoffel receive salary support from the Department of Defense grant SCI170051. These grants are focused on spinal cord injury patients and use patient-reported outcomes. |
Vol 44 - N° 3
P. 507-515 - août 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
