Potential testing of reprocessing procedures by real-time polymerase chain reaction: A multicenter study of colonoscopy devices - 02/02/18

GISIO Working Group of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health
Abstract |
Background |
Reprocessing of endoscopes is key to preventing cross-infection after colonoscopy. Culture-based methods are recommended for monitoring, but alternative and rapid approaches are needed to improve surveillance and reduce turnover times. A molecular strategy based on detection of residual traces from gut microbiota was developed and tested using a multicenter survey.
Methods |
A simplified sampling and DNA extraction protocol using nylon-tipped flocked swabs was optimized. A multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was developed that targeted 6 bacteria genes that were amplified in 3 mixes. The method was validated by interlaboratory tests involving 5 reference laboratories. Colonoscopy devices (n = 111) were sampled in 10 Italian hospitals. Culture-based microbiology and metagenomic tests were performed to verify PCR data.
Results |
The sampling method was easily applied in all 10 endoscopy units and the optimized DNA extraction and amplification protocol was successfully performed by all of the involved laboratories. This PCR-based method allowed identification of both contaminated (n = 59) and fully reprocessed endoscopes (n = 52) with high sensibility (98%) and specificity (98%), within 3-4 hours, in contrast to the 24-72 hours needed for a classic microbiology test. Results were confirmed by next-generation sequencing and classic microbiology.
Conclusions |
A novel approach for monitoring reprocessing of colonoscopy devices was developed and successfully applied in a multicenter survey. The general principle of tracing biological fluids through microflora DNA amplification was successfully applied and may represent a promising approach for hospital hygiene.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : Health care-associated infections, Flocked swab sampling, mfDNA, Sanitation, Surveillance
Plan
| Conflicts of interest: None to report. |
|
| Funding for this study was provided by the Italian Study Group of Hospital Hygiene (GISIO), National Working Group of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. |
|
| The reagents used in this study were provided by MDD University Spin Off, Viterbo, Italy, and Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy. |
Vol 46 - N° 2
P. 159-164 - février 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
