S'abonner

Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment - 23/04/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036 
Binoy Mistry, MD a, Sarah Stewart De Ramirez, MD a, Gabor Kelen, MD a, Paulo S.K. Schmitz, MD c, Kamna S. Balhara, MD d, Scott Levin, PhD, MS a, Diego Martinez, PhD a, Kevin Psoter, PhD b, Xavier Anton, MD e, Jeremiah S. Hinson, MD, PhD a,
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 
b Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 
c Emergency Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 
e Emergency Department, Al-Rahba Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 

Corresponding Author.

Abstract

Study objective

We assess accuracy and variability of triage score assignment by emergency department (ED) nurses using the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in 3 countries. In accordance with previous reports and clinical observation, we hypothesize low accuracy and high variability across all sites.

Methods

This cross-sectional multicenter study enrolled 87 ESI-trained nurses from EDs in Brazil, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Standardized triage scenarios published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) were used. Accuracy was defined by concordance with the AHRQ key and calculated as percentages. Accuracy comparisons were made with one-way ANOVA and paired t test. Interrater reliability was measured with Krippendorff’s α. Subanalyses based on nursing experience and triage scenario type were also performed.

Results

Mean accuracy pooled across all sites and scenarios was 59.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.4% to 62.0%) and interrater reliability was modest (α=.730; 95% CI .692 to .767). There was no difference in overall accuracy between sites or according to nurse experience. Medium-acuity scenarios were scored with greater accuracy (76.4%; 95% CI 72.6% to 80.3%) than high- or low-acuity cases (44.1%, 95% CI 39.3% to 49.0% and 54%, 95% CI 49.9% to 58.2%), and adult scenarios were scored with greater accuracy than pediatric ones (66.2%, 95% CI 62.9% to 69.7% versus 46.9%, 95% CI 43.4% to 50.3%).

Conclusion

In this multinational study, concordance of nurse-assigned ESI score with reference standard was universally poor and variability was high. Although the ESI is the most popular ED triage tool in the United States and is increasingly used worldwide, our findings point to a need for more reliable ED triage tools.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 582 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD
 Author contributions: BM, SSDR, KSB, and JSH conceived and designed the study. BM, SSDR, PSKS, KSB, and XA recruited participants. GK, DM, and KP provided statistical advice on the study design. DM and KP helped analyze the data. SL provided content expertise. BM and JSH drafted the article, and all authors contributed to its revision. JSH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). This work was funded by a Synergy Award from Johns Hopkins University and grant R21HS023641 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Levin is an engineer and the owner of a start-up company that has developed several machine-learning and electronic health record–based tools to improve patient safety and throughput throughout the hospital, including a tool that aims to improve reliability of ED triage.
 The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Johns Hopkins or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


© 2017  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 71 - N° 5

P. 581 - mai 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Triage, Machine Learning, Algorithms, and Becoming the Borg
  • Stephen M. Schenkel, Robert L. Wears
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Intraosseous Vascular Access Is Associated With Lower Survival and Neurologic Recovery Among Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
  • Takahisa Kawano, Brian Grunau, Frank X. Scheuermeyer, Koichiro Gibo, Christopher B. Fordyce, Steve Lin, Robert Stenstrom, Robert Schlamp, Sandra Jenneson, Jim Christenson

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.