S'abonner

Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support - 24/04/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.033 
Mitchell B. Berger, MD, PhD , Giselle E. Kolenic, MA, Dee E. Fenner, MD, Daniel M. Morgan, MD, John O.L. DeLancey, MD
 Pelvic Floor Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 

Corresponding author: Mitchell B. Berger, MD, PhD.

Abstract

Background

Prolapse of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls has been generally associated with apical descent and levator ani muscle defects. However, the relative contributions of these factors to the pathophysiology of descent in the different vaginal compartments is not well understood. Furthermore, symptoms uniquely associated with prolapse in these compartments have not been well characterized.

Objectives

The objectives of the study were to compare the associations between the following: (1) apical support, (2) levator ani muscles, and (3) pelvic floor symptoms in women with posterior-predominant prolapse, anterior-predominant prolapse, and normal support.

Study Design

This is a cross-sectional study with 2 case arms: 60 women with posterior prolapse, 90 with anterior prolapse, and a referent control arm with 103 asymptomatic subjects with normal support, determined from pelvic organ prolapse quantification examinations. Levator muscle defects were graded from magnetic resonance imaging. Vaginal closure forces above resting were measured with an instrumented speculum during maximal contraction. Pelvic floor symptoms were measured via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory–Short Form.

Results

Mean point C location in controls was –6.9 cm [1.5] (mean [standard deviation]); and was higher in posterior prolapse (–4.7 cm [2.7], 2.2 cm below controls) than the anterior prolapse group (–1.2 cm [4.1]; 5.6 cm below controls, P < .001 for all comparisons). Normal-appearing muscles (ie, muscle without a visible defect) occurred at similar frequencies in posterior prolapse (45%) and controls (51%, P = .43) but less often in anterior prolapse (28%, P ≤ .03 for pairwise comparisons). Major levator ani defects occurred at similar rates in women with posterior (33%) and anterior prolapse (42%, P = .27) but less often in controls (16%, P ≤ .012 for both pairwise comparisons). Similarly, there were significant differences in generated vaginal closure forces across the 3 groups, with the prolapse groups generating weaker closure forces than the control group (P = .004), but the differences between the 2 prolapse groups were not significant after controlling for prolapse size (P = .43). Pelvic floor symptoms were more severe for the posterior (mean Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score, 129) and anterior prolapse groups (score, 128) than the controls (score, 40.2, P < .001 for both comparisons); the difference between the 2 prolapse groups was not significant (P = .83).

Conclusion

Posterior-predominant prolapse involves an almost 3-fold less apical descent below normal than anterior-predominant vaginal prolapse. Levator ani defects and muscle impairment also have a lower impact. Pelvic floor symptoms reflect the presence and size of prolapse more than the predominant lax vaginal compartment.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : anterior and posterior vaginal walls, apical descent, levator ani muscle defect, prolapse


Plan


 The National Institutes of Health did not play a role in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for publication.
 This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health Office for Research on Women’s Health grant SCOR P50 HD044406 and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant R01 HD038665. M.B.B. received investigator support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Career development award K12 HD001438.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Berger MB, Kolenic GE, Fenner DE, et al. Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:510.e1-8.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 218 - N° 5

P. 510.e1-510.e8 - mai 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year
  • Brandon K. Bellows, Casey R. Tak, Jessica N. Sanders, David K. Turok, Eleanor B. Schwarz
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pelvic muscles’ mechanical response to strains in the absence and presence of pregnancy-induced adaptations in a rat model
  • Tatiana Catanzarite, Shannon Bremner, Caitlin L. Barlow, Laura Bou-Malham, Shawn O’Connor, Marianna Alperin

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.