Exploring the nurses' role in antibiotic stewardship: A multisite qualitative study of nurses and infection preventionists - 28/04/18
, William G. Greendyke, MD c, d, E. Yoko Furuya, MD, MS c, d, Arjun Srinivasan, MD, FSHEA e, Alexa N. Shelley, MS, FNP-BC a, b, Aditi Bothra, BS, CHES f, Lisa Saiman, MD, MPH c, g, Elaine L. Larson, PhD, RN, FAAN, CIC a, fAbstract |
Background |
There is a growing recognition of the need to partner with nurses to promote effective antibiotic stewardship. In this study, we explored the attitudes of nurses and infection preventionists toward 5 nurse-driven antibiotic stewardship practices: 1) questioning the need for urine cultures; 2) ensuring proper culturing technique; 3) recording an accurate penicillin drug allergy history; 4) encouraging the prompt transition from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) antibiotics; and 5) initiating an antibiotic timeout.
Methods |
Nine focus groups and 4 interviews with 49 clinical nurses, 5 nurse managers, and 7 infection preventionists were conducted across 2 academic pediatric and adult hospitals.
Results |
Nurse-driven antibiotic stewardship was perceived as an extension of the nurses' role as patient advocate. Three practices were perceived most favorably: questioning the necessity of urinary cultures, ensuring proper culturing techniques, and encouraging the prompt transition from IV to PO antibiotics. Remaining recommendations were perceived to lack relevance or to challenge traditionally held nursing responsibilities. Prescriber and family engagement were noted to assist the implementation of select recommendations. Infection preventionists welcomed the opportunity to assist in providing nurse stewardship education.
Conclusions |
Nurses appeared to be enthusiastic about participating in antibiotic stewardship. Efforts to engage nurses should address knowledge needs and consider the contexts in which nurse-driven antibiotic stewardship occurs.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : Nurses, antibiotic stewardship, qualitative research
Plan
| Funding/support: This research was funded by the APIC Heroes Implementation Research Scholar Award Program 2017-18, which was supported by an educational grant from BD (PI: Carter). |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None to report. |
Vol 46 - N° 5
P. 492-497 - mai 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
