Cryotherapy for persistent Barrett’s esophagus after radiofrequency ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis - 14/05/18
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
A small but significant proportion of patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) have persistent dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia (IM) after treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Cryotherapy is a cold-based ablative modality that is increasingly being used in this setting. We aimed to better understand the efficacy of second-line cryotherapy in patients with BE who have persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods |
We performed a systematic literature search of Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science through September 1, 2017. Articles were included for meta-analysis based on the following inclusion criteria: ≥5 patients with BE treated with RFA had persistent dysplasia or IM; they subsequently underwent ≥1 session of cryotherapy with follow-up endoscopy; the proportions of patients achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and/or IM (CE-IM) were reported. The main outcomes were pooled proportions of CE-D and CE-IM by using a random effects model.
Results |
Eleven studies making up 148 patients with BE treated with cryotherapy for persistent dysplasia or IM after RFA were included. The pooled proportion of CE-D was 76.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7-88.0), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 62%). The pooled proportion of CE-IM was 45.9% (95% CI, 32.0-60.5) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 57%). Multiple preplanned subgroup analyses did not sufficiently explain the heterogeneity. Adverse effects were reported in 6.7% of patients.
Conclusion |
Cryotherapy successfully achieved CE-D in three fourths and CE-IM in half of patients with BE who did not respond to initial RFA. Considering its favorable safety profile, cryotherapy may be a viable second-line option for this therapeutically challenging cohort of patients with BE, but higher-quality studies validating this remain warranted.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : BE, CE-D, CE-IM, IM, RFA
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: The authors acknowledge the support of NCI U01 CA182940 and U54 CA163004 as well as support from the Van Cleve development fund (K. Wang). P. Iyer received research support from Exact Sciences, Symple Surgical, Medtronic, and Intromedic. Dr Iyer is a consultant for Medtronic. K. Wang received research support from CSA medical and C2 therapeutics. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. |
|
| See CME section; p. 1565. |
|
| If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Wang at wang.kenneth@mayo.edu. |
Vol 87 - N° 6
P. 1396 - juin 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
