Primary Care and Home Visiting Utilization Patterns among At-Risk Infants - 22/06/18
, Alonzo T. Folger, PhD 3, 4, Heidi J. Sucharew, PhD 3, 4, Courtney M. Brown, MD 3, 5, Eric S. Hall, PhD 3, 6, Judith B. Van Ginkel, PhD 3, Robert T. Ammerman, PhD 3, 7Abstract |
Objective |
To describe well child care (WCC) utilization in the first year of life among at-risk infants, and the relationship to home visiting enrollment.
Study design |
Retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data for infants ≥34 weeks' gestation from 2010 to 2014, within a regional, academic primary care system. Association between WCC visits and home visiting enrollment was evaluated using bivariate comparisons and multivariable Poisson regression. Latent class analysis further characterized longitudinal patterns of WCC attendance. Multivariable logistic regression tested the association between home visiting and pattern of timeliest adherence to recommended WCC.
Results |
Of 11 936 infants, mean number of WCC visits was 4.1 in the first 12 months of life. Of 3910 infants eligible for home visiting, 28.5% were enrolled. Among enrolled infants, mean WCC visits was 4.7 vs 4.4 among eligible, nonenrolled infants, P value < .001. After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between enrollment and WCC visit count (adjusted incident rate ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.99, 1.07). Using latent class analysis, 3 WCC classes were identified: infants in class 1 (77.7%) were most adherent to recommended WCC, class 2 (12.5% of cohort) had progressively declining WCC attendance over the first year of life, and class 3 (9.8%) maintained moderate attendance. In multivariable regression, home visiting was associated with class 1 membership, aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04, 1.57.
Conclusions |
A pattern of timely WCC attendance was more likely among infants in home visiting; however, most infants eligible for home visiting were not enrolled.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : well child care, latent class analysis
Abbreviations : AAP, CCHMC, IRR, LCA, NICU, NFP, WCC
Plan
| Supported by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (R40 MC29447). The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 198
P. 240 - juillet 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
