The Mindful Eating Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties in a Sample of Dutch Adults Aged 55 Years and Older - 22/06/18
, Tatjana van Strien, PhD, Juan Ramón Barrada, PhD, Ingeborg A. Brouwer, PhD, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, PhD, Marjolein Visser, PhDAbstract |
Background |
Earlier scales on mindful eating do not measure mindful eating independent from emotional or external eating, or mindful eating in common situations.
Objective |
The objective was to develop a new instrument to measure the attention element of mindful eating, the Mindful Eating Behavior Scale (MEBS), and to compute the internal structure, reliabilities, and convergent validity of this scale.
Design |
A cross-sectional ancillary study within the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam was conducted between fall 2014 and spring 2015.
Participants/setting |
Participants were 1,227 Dutch adults aged 55 years and older from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.
Main outcome measure |
A selection of 20 items from existing instruments was used to design an initial version of the MEBS.
Statistical analyses performed |
The internal structure of the MEBS was evaluated using an exploratory structural equation modeling approach on half of the sample and confirmatory factor analysis on the whole sample to develop the final version of the scale. The measurement invariance of the scores was tested with respect to sex, age, and body mass index. Reliabilities of subscales were determined with Cronbach’s α. To test convergent validity, the scores of the new scale were correlated with theoretically relevant variables.
Results |
Two items were deleted because of low item loadings and one item because of high correlated uniqueness. The final confirmatory factor analysis model with 17 items and four domains (Focused Eating, Hunger and Satiety Cues, Eating with Awareness, and Eating without Distraction) showed good fit (comparative fit index=0.97, Tucker-Lewis index=0.96, and root mean square error of approximation=0.04). Measurement invariance was found for sex, age, and body mass index. Cronbach’s α values were medium to high (.70 to .89). Most correlations were in the expected directions, which indicated good preliminary convergent validity.
Conclusions |
The MEBS was successfully developed consisting of 17 items and four domains. Because of low interfactor correlations, a total score combining the four domains should not be computed. The MEBS showed good internal consistency and preliminary convergent validity in a sample of Dutch adults aged 55 years and older.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Mindful eating, Questionnaire, Validation, Awareness, Attention
Plan
| Supplementary materials: Figure 2, Figure 3, and Table 4 are available at www.jandonline.org |
|
| STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST T. van Strien has a copyright and royalty interest in the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire and manual. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the other authors. |
|
| FUNDING/SUPPORT Funding was provided by the European Union FP7 MooDFOOD Project Multi-Country Collaborative Project on the Role of Diet, Food-Related Behaviour, and Obesity in the Prevention of Depression (grant agreement no. 613598). The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports, Directorate of Long-Term Care. The data collection during 2012-2013 was financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research in the framework of the New Cohorts of Young Old in the 21st Century project (file no. 480-10-014). |
|
| AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS L. H. H. Winkens, M. Visser, I. A. Brouwer, and T. van Strien designed this study. L. H. H. Winkens collected the data. L. H. H. Winkens wrote the first draft with contributions from M. Visser, I. A. Brouwer, and T. van Strien. J. R. Barrada and L. H. H. Winkens conducted the statistical analyses. All authors reviewed and commented on subsequent drafts of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version. |
Vol 118 - N° 7
P. 1277 - juillet 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
