Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Gender-Nonconforming Children: A Canadian Community-Based Study - 28/06/18

Abstract |
Objective |
To examine childhood gender nonconformity (GNC) and psychological well-being in a community-based sample using measures that bridge clinical and nonclinical literature.
Method |
Caregivers reported on the GNC (Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children [GIQC]) and behavioral and emotional problems (Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL]) of their children aged 6 to 12 years (N = 1719, 48.8% boys). The GIQC was compared to the commonly used single-item proxy, CBCL Item 110 (“wishes to be of the opposite sex”).
Results |
Using the GIQC, 2.3% of boys and 2.8% of girls showed GNC levels comparable to those of children referred clinically for gender dysphoria (GD). Item 110 was endorsed for 1.7% of boys and 1.8% of girls. These measures corresponded, but Item 110 endorsement was biased toward more extreme GNC. Among boys, increased GNC on the GIQC, but not Item 110, corresponded with increased clinical-range CBCL problems. Among girls, Item 110 endorsement was associated with increased clinical-range Externalizing problems, whereas the GIQC indicated that intermediate gender expression was associated with fewer externalizing problems. Overall, rates of clinical-range CBCL problems among GNC children were consistent with those reported for GD-referred children.
Conclusion |
The scope of mental health risk among community children who exhibit GNC is likely considerably greater than previously recognized. A substantial minority of community children show GNC and mental health risk levels comparable to those seen among GD-referred children. Also, compared to the GIQC, a more comprehensive GNC measure, CBCL Item 110 is likely useful only for detecting extreme manifestations of GNC, which may affect associations with mental health.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : gender nonconformity, Child Behavior Checklist, mental health, community sample
Plan
| Mss. Nabbijohn and Santarossa were supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Undergraduate Research Awards. This research was funded by a University of Toronto Mississauga Research and Scholarly Activity Fund Award and a SSHRC Insight Development Grant awarded to Dr. VanderLaan. |
|
| Disclosure: Drs. van der Miesen and VanderLaan and Mss. Nabbijohn and Santarossa report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. |
Vol 57 - N° 7
P. 491-499 - juillet 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
