Assessing Ethics Knowledge: Development of a Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology - 25/07/18
, Gina M. Geis, MD 2, Henry A. Feldman, PhD 3, Elisa R. Berson, BS 1, Jennifer C. Kesselheim, MD, MEd, MBE 4Abstract |
Objective |
To develop and validate the Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology (TEK-Neo) with good internal consistency reliability, item performance, and construct validity that reliably assesses interprofessional staff and trainee knowledge of neonatal ethics.
Study design |
We adapted a published test of ethics knowledge for use in neonatology. The novel instrument had 46 true/false questions distributed among 7 domains of neonatal ethics: ethical principles, professionalism, genetic testing, beginning of life/viability, end of life, informed permission/decision making, and research ethics. Content and correct answers were derived from published statements and guidelines. We administered the voluntary, anonymous test via e-mailed link to 103 participants, including medical students, neonatology fellows, neonatologists, neonatology nurses, and pediatric ethicists. After item reduction, we examined psychometric properties of the resulting 36-item test and assessed overall sample performance.
Results |
The overall response rate was 27% (103 of 380). The test demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach α = 0.66), with a mean score of 28.5 ± 3.4 out of the maximum 36. Participants with formal ethics training performed better than those without (30.3 ± 2.9 vs 28.1 ± 3.5; P = .01). Performance improved significantly with higher levels of medical/ethical training among the 5 groups: medical students, 25.9 ± 3.7; neonatal nurses/practitioners, 27.7 ± 2.7; neonatologists, 28.8 ± 3.7; neonatology fellows, 29.8 ± 2.9; and clinical ethicists, 33.0 ± 1.9 (P < .0001).
Conclusions |
The TEK-Neo reliably assesses knowledge of neonatal ethics among interprofessional staff and trainees in neonatology. This novel tool discriminates between learners with different levels of expertise and can be used interprofessionally to assess individual and group performance, track milestone progression, and address curricular gaps in neonatal ethics.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : assessment, professionalism, medical ethics, medical education, milestones
Abbreviations : ACGME, ASBH, NICU, PD, TEK-Neo
Plan
| Funded in part by the Arnold P. Gold Foundation (Grant FI-15-005, to C.C.). The sponsor had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
|
| Portions of this study were presented at the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities annual conference, Washington, DC, October 6-9, 2016, and as a poster presentation at the Boston Children's Hospital Medical Education Day, April 26, 2017. |
Vol 199
P. 57-64 - août 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
