Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial - 01/09/18
Summary |
Background |
There is increasing interest in the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Suggested advantages are that ADMs facilitate one-stage IBBR and improve aesthetic outcomes. We compared immediate one-stage ADM-assisted IBBR with two-stage IBBR (current standard of care). Our previously reported secondary endpoint showed that one-stage ADM-assisted IBBR was associated with significantly more adverse outcomes. Here, we present the primary endpoint results aiming to assess whether one-stage IBBR with ADM provides higher patient-reported quality of life (QOL) compared with two-stage IBBR.
Methods |
This multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial (BRIOS study) was done in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We recruited women aged older than 18 years with breast carcinoma or a genetic predisposition who intended to undergo skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate IBBR. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo one-stage IBBR with ADM (Strattice, LifeCell, Branchburg, NJ, USA) or two-stage IBBR. Randomisation was stratified by centre and indication for surgery (oncological or prophylactic) in blocks of ten participants. The primary endpoint was patient-reported QOL, as measured with the BREAST-Q (ie, health-related QOL scales and satisfaction scales), in the modified intention-to-treat population. The study follow-up is complete. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR5446.
Findings |
Between April 14, 2013, and May 29, 2015, we enrolled 142 women, of whom 69 were randomly assigned to receive one-stage ADM-assisted IBBR and 73 to receive two-stage IBBR. After exclusions, the modified intention-to-treat population comprised 60 patients in the one-stage group and 61 patients in the two-stage group. Of these, 48 women (mean follow-up 17·0 months [SD 7·8]) in the one-stage group and 44 women (17·2 months [SD 6·7]) in the two-stage group completed the BREAST-Q at least 1 year after implant placement. We found no significant differences in postoperative patient-reported QOL domains, including physical wellbeing (one-stage mean 78·0 [SD 14·1] vs two-stage 79·3 [12·2], p=0·60), psychosocial wellbeing (72·6 [17·3] vs 72·8 [19·6], p=0·95), and sexual wellbeing (58·0 [17·0] vs 57·1 [19·5], p=0·82), or in the patient-reported satisfaction domains: satisfaction with breasts (63·4 [15·8] vs 60·3 [15·4], p=0·35) and satisfaction with outcome (72·8 [19·1] vs 67·8 [16·3], p=0·19).
Interpretation |
Taken together with our previously published findings, one-stage IBBR with ADM does not yield superior results in terms of patient-reported QOL compared with two-stage IBBR. Risks for adverse outcomes were significantly higher in the one-stage ADM group. Use of ADM for one-stage IBBM should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Funding |
Pink Ribbon, Nuts-Ohra, and LifeCell.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 19 - N° 9
P. 1205-1214 - septembre 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Mogamulizumab versus vorinostat in previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MAVORIC): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial
- Youn H Kim, Martine Bagot, Lauren Pinter-Brown, Alain H Rook, Pierluigi Porcu, Steven M Horwitz, Sean Whittaker, Yoshiki Tokura, Maarten Vermeer, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Lubomir Sokol, Stephen Morris, Ellen J Kim, Pablo L Ortiz-Romero, Herbert Eradat, Julia Scarisbrick, Athanasios Tsianakas, Craig Elmets, Stephane Dalle, David C Fisher, Ahmad Halwani, Brian Poligone, John Greer, Maria Teresa Fierro, Amit Khot, Alison J Moskowitz, Amy Musiek, Andrei Shustov, Barbara Pro, Larisa J Geskin, Karen Dwyer, Junji Moriya, Mollie Leoni, Jeffrey S Humphrey, Stacie Hudgens, Dmitri O Grebennik, Kensei Tobinai, Madeleine Duvic, MAVORIC Investigators, Sunil Abhyankar, Oleg Akilov, Onder Alpdogan, Marie Beylot-Barry, Erin Boh, Dolores Caballero, Richard Cowan, Brigitte Dreno, Reinhard Dummer, Timothy Fenske, Francine Foss, Noriko Fukuhara, Pratyush Giri, Koji Habe, Toshihisa Hamada, Kiyohiko Hatake, Shinsuke Iida, Osamu Ishikawa, Lars Iversen, Eiji Kiyohara, Hiroshi Koga, Neil Korman, Bryone Jean Kuss, Zanetta Lamar, Frederick Lansigan, Mary Jo Lechowicz, Adam Lerner, Nina Magnolo, Lawrence Mark, Tomomitsu Miyagaki, Javier Munoz, Jan Peter Nicolay, Kaoru Nishiwaki, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Mikio Ohtsuka, Theresa Pacheco, Christiane Querfeld, Ronald Peter Rapini, Shigetoshi Sano, Maiko Tanaka, Michael D. Tharp, Jiro Uehara, Hidefumi Wada, Jillian Wells, Ryan A. Wilcox, Basem William, Kentaro Yonekura
- Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL2-BAG): primary endpoint analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
- Paula Cramer, Julia von Tresckow, Jasmin Bahlo, Sandra Robrecht, Petra Langerbeins, Othman Al-Sawaf, Anja Engelke, Anna-Maria Fink, Kirsten Fischer, Eugen Tausch, Till Seiler, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Holger Hebart, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Sebastian Böttcher, Matthias Ritgen, Michael Kneba, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Barbara Eichhorst, Michael Hallek
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?