Caregiver Perceptions about their Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy for Children with Medical Complexity - 21/11/18
, Shannon L. Golden, MA 2, W. Adam Gower, MD, MS 3, †, Nancy M.P. King, JD 2Abstract |
Objective |
To describe the perceptions of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) about their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children, in particular the satisfaction with their decision.
Study design |
In this qualitative study conducted in western North Carolina between 2013 and 2014, we interviewed 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had received tracheostomies in the past 5 years. Three of the CMC were deceased at the time of the interview; 8 were decannulated. In-depth interviews (35 English, 6 Spanish) were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used ATLAS.ti software to manage data and identified themes related to caregiver perceptions about tracheostomy decision.
Results |
We found that caregivers often chose tracheostomy because extending the lives of their children and being able to care for them at home were important. Caregivers reported the many benefits of tracheostomy including improvement in respiratory symptoms, physical and developmental health, quality of life, and means to provide medical care quickly when needed. There were negative effects of tracheostomy such as mucous plugs, excessive secretions, accidental decannulation necessitating emergency tracheostomy tube change, and the increased infection risk. Providing medical care for CMC with tracheostomy at home was difficult, but improved over time. Caregivers were generally satisfied with their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their CMC.
Conclusions |
Decisional satisfaction with tracheostomy for CMC is high. In counseling caregivers about tracheostomy, clinicians should present both the benefits and risks. Future studies should quantify the outcomes described in this study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : pediatrics, life-sustaining treatments, decision-making, outcomes
Abbreviations : BCH, CMC, LST, PECP
Plan
| Supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (R21NR013272 [to S.N.]). The sponsor played no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data; in the writing of this manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
|
| Portions of this study were presented at the Pediatric Academic Society annual meeting, April 30 - May 6, 2016, Baltimore, Maryland. |
Vol 203
P. 354 - décembre 2018 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
