Continued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Impact of Postoperative Anticoagulant Management on Outcome in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - 09/03/19
, Lisa Crusius, MD b, 1, Stephan Haussig, MD a, Felix J. Woitek, MD a, Philipp Kiefer, MD c, Georg Stachel, MD b, Sergey Leontyev, MD c, Florian Schlotter, MD b, Aileen Spindler, MD b, Robert Höllriegel, MD a, Jennifer Hommel, MA a, Holger Thiele, MD b, Michael A. Borger, PhD c, David Holzhey, MD c, Axel Linke, MD aRésumé |
The role of continued versus interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is uncertain. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the impact (1) of continued versus interrupted OAC on early safety and (2) of postoperative anticoagulant management on the 1-year mortality in patients with AF who underwent TF-TAVI. Consecutive patients with AF and on OAC at admission (n = 598) were stratified according to interrupted (iVKA) versus continued vitamin K antagonist (cVKA) versus continued direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) at the time of TF-TAVI. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 early safety was the primary outcome measure. Patients with iVKA (n = 299), cVKA (n = 117), and DOAC (n = 182) had comparable baseline characteristics including age (p = 0.25), gender (p = 0.33), and STS-Score (p = 0.072). The proportion of patients having a CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥3 (p = 0.791) and HAS-BLED-Score ≥3 (p = 0.185) was not different between groups. The rate of early safety events (with lower values indicating superior safety) was lowest in DOAC (13.2%) and not increased in cVKA (19.7%) compared to iVKA (23.1%) (p = 0.029). Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 defined stroke (p = 0.527) and bleeding (p = 0.097) did not differ between groups. Renal failure occurred more often in iVKA compared to cVKA and DOAC (p = 0.02). All-cause 1-year mortality was 20.1% in iVKA, 13.7% in cVKA, and 8.8% in DOAC (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed DOAC to be associated with reduced all-cause 1-year mortality (HR 0.56 (95%-CI 0.32 to 0.99), p = 0.047) whereas cVKA was comparable to iVKA (HR 0.75 (95%-CI 0.43 to 1.31), p = 0.307). In conclusion, cVKA did not increase the rate for the composite end point of early safety at 30 days in this cohort of patients. Treatment with a DOAC was associated with a significantly reduced rate of early safety end points at 30 days and lower 1-year mortality.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 123 - N° 7
P. 1134-1141 - avril 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Incidence, Predictors, Management, and Clinical Significance of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
- Yong-Hoon Yoon, Jung-Min Ahn, Do-Yoon Kang, Euihong Ko, Pil Hyung Lee, Seung-Whan Lee, Ho Jin Kim, Joon Bum Kim, Suk Jung Choo, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park
- Predictors of Hospital Cost After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database
- Tomo Ando, Oluwole Adegbala, Pedro A. Villablanca, Emmanuel Akintoye, Said Ashraf, Alexandros Briasoulis, Tesfaye Telila, Hisato Takagi, Cindy L. Grines, Theodore Schreiber, Deepak L. Bhatt, Luis Afonso
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?