Local anesthetics and regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update - 15/03/19

Abstract |
Background |
Regional anesthesia may mitigate the risk of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). This Cochrane review, published originally in 2012, was updated in 2017.
Methods |
We updated our search of Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL to December 2017. Only RCTs investigating local anesthetics (by any route) or regional anesthesia versus any combination of systemic (opioid or non-opioid) analgesia in adults or children, reporting any pain outcomes beyond three months were included.
Data were extracted independently by at least two authors, who also appraised methodological quality with Cochrane ‘Risk of bias’ assessment and pooled data in surgical subgroups. We pooled studies across different follow-up intervals. As summary statistic, we reported the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals and calculated the number needed to benefit (NNTB). We considered classical, Bayesian alternatives to our evidence synthesis. We explored heterogeneity and methodological bias.
Results |
40 new and seven ongoing studies, identified in this update, brought the total included RCTs to 63. We were only able to synthesize data from 39 studies enrolling 3027 participants in a balanced design.
Evidence synthesis favored regional anesthesia for thoracotomy (OR 0.52 [0.32 to 0.84], moderate-quality evidence), breast cancer surgery (OR 0.43 [0.28 to 0.68], low-quality evidence), and cesarean section (OR 0.46, [0.28 to 0.78], moderate-quality evidence). Evidence synthesis favored continuous infusion of local anesthetic after breast cancer surgery (OR 0.24 [0.08 to 0.69], moderate-quality evidence), but was inconclusive after iliac crest bone graft harvesting (OR 0.20, [0.04 to 1.09], low-quality evidence).
Conclusions |
Regional anesthesia reduces the risk of PPP. Small study size, performance, null, and attrition bias considerably weakened our conclusions. We cannot extrapolate to other interventions or to children.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Regional anesthesia prevents central sensitization.
This graphical abstract explains how regional anesthesia prevents central sensitization [3]. Panel A depicts the normal pain transmission from the primary nociceptor via the synapsis in the posterior horn of the spinal column to the brain, modulated and altered by low threshold mechanoceptors as described by Woolf [23]. The barrage of perioperative pain leads to persistent sensitization of the synapsis, as shown in Panel B. As a consequence, mild pain is augmented in the sensitized synapsis and transmitted as severe pain (hyperalgesia), even touch can be transmitted as painful (allodynia), as explicated in Panel C. This process termed central sensitization, can be mitigated or prevented by blocking the barrage of pain signals with local anesthetics, preventing the development of persistent pain after surgery, as demonstrated in Panel D.
Highlights |
• | Persistent pain after surgery is frequent, debilitating, and prevention is paramount. |
• | 39 RCTs enrolling 3027 participants favored regional anesthesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain. |
• | Local anesthetics and regional anesthesia reduce the risk of persistent pain after surgery, but the strength of the evidence is intermediate only. |
Keywords : Chronic pain/prevention & control, Meta-analysis
Plan
| ☆ | Interim data from this work were presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society Anesthesiology in Boston, October 21 to October 25, 2017. |
Vol 55
P. 116-127 - août 2019 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
