S'abonner

Local anesthetics and regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update - 15/03/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.043 
Jacob L. Levene a, Erica J. Weinstein a, Marc S. Cohen b, Doerthe A. Andreae c, Jerry Y. Chao b, Matthew Johnson d, Charles B. Hall e, Michael H. Andreae f,
a Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, United States of America 
b Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America 
c Department of Allergy/Immunology, Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States of America 
d Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America 
e Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America 
f Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hersey, PA 17033, United States of America.Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterPenn State College of Medicine500 University DriveHerseyPA17033United States of America

Abstract

Background

Regional anesthesia may mitigate the risk of persistent postoperative pain (PPP). This Cochrane review, published originally in 2012, was updated in 2017.

Methods

We updated our search of Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL to December 2017. Only RCTs investigating local anesthetics (by any route) or regional anesthesia versus any combination of systemic (opioid or non-opioid) analgesia in adults or children, reporting any pain outcomes beyond three months were included.

Data were extracted independently by at least two authors, who also appraised methodological quality with Cochrane ‘Risk of bias’ assessment and pooled data in surgical subgroups. We pooled studies across different follow-up intervals. As summary statistic, we reported the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals and calculated the number needed to benefit (NNTB). We considered classical, Bayesian alternatives to our evidence synthesis. We explored heterogeneity and methodological bias.

Results

40 new and seven ongoing studies, identified in this update, brought the total included RCTs to 63. We were only able to synthesize data from 39 studies enrolling 3027 participants in a balanced design.

Evidence synthesis favored regional anesthesia for thoracotomy (OR 0.52 [0.32 to 0.84], moderate-quality evidence), breast cancer surgery (OR 0.43 [0.28 to 0.68], low-quality evidence), and cesarean section (OR 0.46, [0.28 to 0.78], moderate-quality evidence). Evidence synthesis favored continuous infusion of local anesthetic after breast cancer surgery (OR 0.24 [0.08 to 0.69], moderate-quality evidence), but was inconclusive after iliac crest bone graft harvesting (OR 0.20, [0.04 to 1.09], low-quality evidence).

Conclusions

Regional anesthesia reduces the risk of PPP. Small study size, performance, null, and attrition bias considerably weakened our conclusions. We cannot extrapolate to other interventions or to children.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Graphical abstract

Regional anesthesia prevents central sensitization.

This graphical abstract explains how regional anesthesia prevents central sensitization [3]. Panel A depicts the normal pain transmission from the primary nociceptor via the synapsis in the posterior horn of the spinal column to the brain, modulated and altered by low threshold mechanoceptors as described by Woolf [23]. The barrage of perioperative pain leads to persistent sensitization of the synapsis, as shown in Panel B. As a consequence, mild pain is augmented in the sensitized synapsis and transmitted as severe pain (hyperalgesia), even touch can be transmitted as painful (allodynia), as explicated in Panel C. This process termed central sensitization, can be mitigated or prevented by blocking the barrage of pain signals with local anesthetics, preventing the development of persistent pain after surgery, as demonstrated in Panel D.



Unlabelled Image

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Persistent pain after surgery is frequent, debilitating, and prevention is paramount.
39 RCTs enrolling 3027 participants favored regional anesthesia for the prevention of persistent postoperative pain.
Local anesthetics and regional anesthesia reduce the risk of persistent pain after surgery, but the strength of the evidence is intermediate only.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Chronic pain/prevention & control, Meta-analysis


Plan


 Interim data from this work were presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society Anesthesiology in Boston, October 21 to October 25, 2017.


© 2019  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 55

P. 116-127 - août 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The impact of reduction of testing at a Preoperative Evaluation Clinic for elective cases: Value added without adverse outcomes
  • Sara E. Nelson, Gen Li, Hanyuan Shi, Maxim Terekhov, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, Jonathan P. Wanderer
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Recent cocaine use and the incidence of hemodynamic events during general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
  • Tiffany S. Moon, Michael X. Gonzales, Joshua J. Sun, Agnes Kim, Pamela E. Fox, Abu T. Minhajuddin, Taylor J. Pak, Babatunde Ogunnaike

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.