Identification of urinary tract infections using electronic health record data - 30/03/19
, Michael Bronsert, PhD b, c, Karl Hammermeister, MD b, c, d, William G. Henderson, PhD a, b, c, Abhinav B. Singh, MD c, Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH b, cRésumé |
Background |
Population ascertainment of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) is time-consuming and expensive, as it often requires manual chart review. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program UTI status of patients who underwent an operation at the University of Colorado Hospital, we sought to develop an algorithm for identifying UTIs using data from the electronic health record.
Methods |
Data were split into training (operations occurring between 2013-2015) and test (operations in 2016) sets. A binomial generalized linear model with an elastic-net penalty was used to fit the model and carry out variables selection. International classification of disease codes, common procedural terminology codes, antibiotics, catheterization, and common procedural terminology-specific UTI event rates were included as predictors. The Youden's J statistic was used to determine the optimal classification threshold.
Results |
Of 6,840 patients, 134 (2.0%) had a UTI. The model achieved 92% specificity, 80% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, 16% positive predictive value, and an area under the curve of 0.94 using a decision threshold of 0.03.
Conclusions |
A model with 14 predictors from the electronic health record identifies UTIs well, and it could be used to scale up UTI surveillance or to estimate the impact of large-scale interventions on UTI rates.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Elastic-net, Supervised learning, Postoperative complication, Electronic health record UTI
Plan
| Funding/support: This project was supported by grant number R03HS026019 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This study was also supported by a transformational research grant from the University of Colorado School of Medicine's Data-Science-to-Patient-Value initiative. |
|
| The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None to report. |
Vol 47 - N° 4
P. 371-375 - avril 2019 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
