Endoscopic intervention and cholecystectomy in pregnant women with acute biliary pancreatitis decrease early readmissions - 17/05/19
Abstract |
Background and Aims |
Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is associated with increased rates of morbidity in pregnancy. Because there is a paucity of population-based studies evaluating ABP in pregnancy, we sought to investigate clinical outcomes in hospitalized pregnant women on a national level.
Methods |
By using the Nationwide Readmission Database (2011-2014), we identified all women (age ≥18 years) with an index admission for ABP in the United States. Multivariate and propensity-score matched analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of pregnancy on the clinical outcomes of early readmission and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) in ABP.
Results |
There were 7787 hospitalizations for ABP in pregnant women during the study period. The rate of 30-day readmission was 16.26%; 57% of these early readmissions were due to adverse events of ABP. Compared with nonpregnant women with ABP, ERCP (21.1% vs 25.2%; P < .001) and cholecystectomy (52.8% vs 55.2%; P = .02) were performed less frequently during pregnancy. Propensity-score matched analysis revealed an increased risk of 30-day readmissions in pregnancy (odds ratio [OR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-2.30), whereas there was no difference in the risk of SAP (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.76-1.57). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that weekend admission (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.79) and >1 week of hospitalization (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.24-2.48) increased the risk of 30-day readmission, whereas ERCP (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.57) and cholecystectomy (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.10-0.18) reduced the odds of early readmission in pregnancy.
Conclusions |
Pregnant women with ABP less frequently undergo timely endoscopic biliary decompression and cholecystectomy. These modifiable factors can potentially lower early readmissions in pregnant women.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Abbreviations : ABP, ICD-9-CM, Ninth Revision, NRD, SAP
Plan
| Disclosure: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. |
|
| See CME section; p. 1241. |
Vol 89 - N° 6
P. 1169 - juin 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees
- Sachin Wani, Samuel Han, Violette Simon, Matthew Hall, Dayna Early, Eva Aagaard, Wasif M. Abidi, Subhas Banerjee, Todd H. Baron, Michael Bartel, Erik Bowman, Brian C. Brauer, Jonathan M. Buscaglia, Linda Carlin, Amitabh Chak, Hemant Chatrath, Abhishek Choudhary, Bradley Confer, Gregory A. Coté, Koushik K. Das, Christopher J. DiMaio, Andrew M. Dries, Steven A. Edmundowicz, Abdul Hamid El Chafic, Ihab El Hajj, Swan Ellert, Jason Ferreira, Anthony Gamboa, Ian S. Gan, Lisa Gangarosa, Bhargava Gannavarapu, Stuart R. Gordon, Nalini M. Guda, Hazem T. Hammad, Cynthia Harris, Sujai Jalaj, Paul Jowell, Sana Kenshil, Jason Klapman, Michael L. Kochman, Sri Komanduri, Gabriel Lang, Linda S. Lee, David E. Loren, Frank J. Lukens, Daniel Mullady, Raman V. Muthusamy, Andrew S. Nett, Mojtaba S. Olyaee, Kavous Pakseresht, Pranith Perera, Patrick Pfau, Cyrus Piraka, John M. Poneros, Amit Rastogi, Anthony Razzak, Brian Riff, Shreyas Saligram, James M. Scheiman, Isaiah Schuster, Raj J. Shah, Rishi Sharma, Joshua P. Spaete, Ajaypal Singh, Muhammad Sohail, Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah, Tyler Stevens, James H. Tabibian, Demetrios Tzimas, Dushant S. Uppal, Shiro Urayama, Domenico Vitterbo, Andrew Y. Wang, Wahid Wassef, Patrick Yachimski, Sergio Zepeda-Gomez, Tobias Zuchelli, Rajesh N. Keswani
- ERCP and elective cholecystectomy are safe in pregnant patients with acute biliary pancreatitis
- Richard Robbins, Waqar A. Qureshi
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?