Trauma video review utilization: A survey of practice in the United States - 12/12/19
, M.A. Vella b
, J.S. Hatchimonji c
, L. Ma c
, Z. Maher d
, D.N. Holena c, e 
Abstract |
Introduction |
Trauma video review (TVR) for quality improvement and education in the United States has been described for nearly three decades. The most recent information on this practice indicated a declining prevalence. We hypothesized that TVR utilization has increased since most recent estimates.
Methods |
We conducted a survey of TVR practices at level I and level II US trauma centers. We distributed an electronic survey covering past, current, and future TVR utilization to the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma membership.
Results |
45.0% of US level I and level II trauma centers completed surveys. 71/249 centers (28.5%) had active TVR programs. The use of TVR did not differ between level I and level II centers (28.8% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.87). Respondents using TVR were overwhelmingly positive about its perception (median score 8, [IQR 6–9]; 10 = ‘best’) at their institutions.
Conclusions |
TVR use at Level I centers has increased over the past decade. Increased TVR utilization may form the basis for multicenter studies comparing processes of care during trauma resuscitation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | The use of trauma video review has increased over the past decade. |
• | Users find the technology highly useful and reliable. |
• | Medicolegal concerns about trauma video review utilization are not substantiated by active trauma video review users. |
Keywords : Trauma video review, Education, Quality improvement, Medicolegal
Plan
| ☆ | This paper was presented at the European Society for Trauma & Emergency Surgery in Prague, Czech Republic May 2019. |
Vol 219 - N° 1
P. 49-53 - janvier 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
