S'abonner

Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (New EPOC): long-term results of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial - 03/03/20

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30798-3 
John A Bridgewater, ProfPhD a, , Siân A Pugh, MRCP b, Tom Maishman, PhD c, Zina Eminton, BSc c, Jane Mellor, MSc c, Amy Whitehead, PhD c, Louise Stanton, MSc c, Michael Radford c, Andrea Corkhill, BSc c, Gareth O Griffiths, ProfPhD c, Stephen Falk, MD e, Juan W Valle, ProfMD f, Derek O’Reilly, FRCS g, Ajith K Siriwardena, ProfMD g, Joanne Hornbuckle, MD h, Myrddin Rees, MS i, Timothy J Iveson, ProfMD j, Tamas Hickish, ProfMD k, O James Garden, ProfMD l, David Cunningham, ProfFMedSci m, Timothy S Maughan, ProfFMedSci n, John N Primrose, ProfFMedSci d,
on behalf of the

New EPOC investigators

  New EPOC investigators are listed in the Supplementary Material
Alaaeldin Shablack, Ann O’Callaghan, (Margaret) Anne Moody, Alex Allen, Alison Brewster, Alison Brown, Astrid Mayer, Brian Davidson, Chan Ton, Charles Wilson, Charles Lowdell, Charlotte Rees, Christopher Baughan, Clare Barlow, Colin Purcell, David Smith, David Tsang, Ewan Brown, Georgina Walker, Hassan Malik, Iain Cameron, Luke Nolan, Marcia Hall, Marjorie Tomlinson, Mark Hill, Mark Peterson, Meg Finch-Jones, Nagappan Kumar, Nariman Karanjia, Nasim Ali, Nigel Heaton, Nua Chan Ton, Paul Ross, Raaj Praseedom, Robert Thomas, Sally Clive, Sarah Slater, Sarah Smith, Satvinder Mudan, Satya Bhattacharya, Sharadah Essapen, Sherif Raouf, Stephen Fenwick, Susan Cleator, Tom Diamond, Vanessa Potter

a UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK 
b Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 
c Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
d Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 
e Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK 
f Division of Cancer Sciences/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
g Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK 
h Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK 
i Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK 
j University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK 
k Dorset Cancer Centre/Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK 
l Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, UK 
m Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK 
n MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof John Primrose, Department of Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK Department of Surgery Southampton General Hospital University of Southampton Southampton SO16 6YD UK ** Prof John Bridgewater, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6AG, UK UCL Cancer Institute University College London London WC1E 6AG UK

Summary

Background

The interim analysis of the multicentre New EPOC trial in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis showed a significant reduction in progression-free survival in patients allocated to cetuximab plus chemotherapy compared with those given chemotherapy alone. The focus of the present analysis was to assess the effect on overall survival.

Methods

New EPOC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with KRAS wild-type (codons 12, 13, and 61) resectable or suboptimally resectable colorectal liver metastases and a WHO performance status of 0–2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy with or without cetuximab before and after liver resection. Randomisation was done centrally with minimisation factors of surgical centre, poor prognosis cancer, and previous adjuvant treatment with oxaliplatin. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 2 h, l-folinic acid (175 mg flat dose administered intravenously over 2 h) or d,l-folinic acid (350 mg flat dose administered intravenously over 2 h), and fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 5 min, followed by a 46 h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 repeated every 2 weeks (regimen one), or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 2 h and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 repeated every 3 weeks (regimen two). Patients who had received adjuvant oxaliplatin could receive irinotecan 180 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min with fluorouracil instead of oxaliplatin (regimen three). Cetuximab was given intravenously, 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with regimen one and three or a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by a weekly infusion of 250 mg/m2 with regimen two. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was published previously. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, preoperative response, pathological resection status, and safety. Trial recruitment was halted prematurely on the advice of the Trial Steering Committee on Nov 1, 2012. All analyses (except safety) were done on the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 22944367.

Findings

Between Feb 26, 2007, and Oct 12, 2012, 257 eligible patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with cetuximab (n=129) or without cetuximab (n=128). This analysis was carried out 5 years after the last patient was recruited, as defined in the protocol, at a median follow-up of 66·7 months (IQR 58·0–77·5). Median progression-free survival was 22·2 months (95% CI 18·3–26·8) in the chemotherapy alone group and 15·5 months (13·8–19·0) in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·17, 95% CI 0·87–1·56; p=0·304). Median overall survival was 81·0 months (59·6 to not reached) in the chemotherapy alone group and 55·4 months (43·5–71·5) in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group (HR 1·45, 1·02–2·05; p=0·036). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcomes of preoperative response or pathological resection status between groups. Five deaths might have been treatment-related (one in the chemotherapy alone group and four in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events reported were: neutrophil count decreased (26 [19%] of 134 in the chemotherapy alone group vs 21 [15%] of 137 in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group), diarrhoea (13 [10%] vs 14 [10%]), skin rash (one [1%] vs 22 [16%]), thromboembolic events (ten [7%] vs 11 [8%]), lethargy (ten [7%] vs nine [7%]), oral mucositis (three [2%] vs 14 [10%]), vomiting (seven [5%] vs seven [5%]), peripheral neuropathy (eight [6%] vs five [4%]), and pain (six [4%] vs six [4%]).

Interpretation

Although the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy improves the overall survival in some studies in patients with advanced, inoperable metastatic disease, its use in the perioperative setting in patients with operable disease confers a significant disadvantage in terms of overall survival. Cetuximab should not be used in this setting.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2020  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 21 - N° 3

P. 398-411 - mars 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Patient-reported outcomes following pembrolizumab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum in patients with previously untreated, metastatic, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-189): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
  • Marina C Garassino, Shirish Gadgeel, Emilio Esteban, Enriqueta Felip, Giovanna Speranza, Manuel Domine, Maximilian J Hochmair, Steven Powell, Susanna Yee-Shan Cheng, Helge G Bischoff, Nir Peled, Martin Reck, Rina Hui, Edward B Garon, Michael Boyer, Ziwen Wei, Thomas Burke, M Catherine Pietanza, Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
  • Per Pfeiffer, Mette Yilmaz, Sören Möller, Daniela Zitnjak, Merete Krogh, Lone Nørgård Petersen, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen, Stine Braendegaard Winther, Karina Gravgaard Thomsen, Camilla Qvortrup

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.