S'abonner

Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial - 28/07/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.001 
Jeffrey S. Schachar, MD a, David Ossin, MD b, Andre R. Plair, MD a, Eric A. Hurtado, MD b, Candace Parker-Autry, MD a, Gopal Badlani, MD a, G. Willy Davila, MD b, Catherine A. Matthews, MD a, ⁎
a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, the Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC 
b Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, the Department of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 

∗ Corresponding author: Catherine A. Matthews, MD.

Abstract

Background

Rates of postoperative incomplete bladder emptying vary significantly after pelvic reconstructive surgery. With enhanced recovery protocols the paradigm is shifting towards same-day discharge and the rates of incomplete bladder emptying are expected to increase. The optimal length of time for postoperative catheter drainage has not been clearly established. There are no current studies that assess the optimal timing of a repeat voiding trial in women who have unsuccessful same day voiding trials.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of a second voiding trial performed 2–4 days (earlier group) vs 7 days (later group) postoperatively in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal prolapse surgery. Secondary aims included postoperative urinary tract infection rates, total days with a catheter, and patient-reported catheter bother between groups.

Study Design

Across 2 sites, women undergoing multicompartment vaginal repair were enrolled. Within 6 hours postoperatively, subjects had an active retrograde voiding trial. Those who passed this voiding trial exited the study; those who had persistent incomplete bladder emptying (postvoid residual >100 mL) had a transurethral indwelling catheter placed and were randomized to return for an earlier (postoperative day 2–4) vs later (postoperative day 7) follow-up office voiding trial. Subjects were followed for 6 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial. Secondary outcomes included rates of urinary tract infection, total days with a catheter, and subjective catheter bother. A power calculation based on a projected 31% difference, a power of 0.8, and an alpha of 0.05 revealed that 30 subjects were needed in each group.

Results

A total of 102 subjects were enrolled; 38 exited on postoperative day 0, leaving 64 subjects for randomization (4 of whom withdrew after randomization). A comparison of data revealed that randomization was effective, with no differences between the earlier and later groups in terms of demographic data or surgical procedures. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, women in the earlier group were more likely to be unsuccessful in their follow-up office voiding trial (23.3%) than the later group (3.3%), with a risk difference of 20% (95% confidence interval, 3.56–36.44) and a relative risk of 7.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.92–53.47; P =.02). A number-needed-to-treat calculation found that for every 5 patients using a catheter for 7 days postoperatively, 1 case of persistent postoperative incomplete bladder emptying was prevented. Rates of catheter bother did not differ between groups at the time of the follow-up office voiding trial or at 6 weeks ( P =.09 and P =.20, respectively). Urinary tract infection rates were higher in the earlier group but did not reach statistical significance (23% vs 7%, P =.07). Regression analysis revealed that subjects who required additional pain medication refills were 9.6 times (95% confidence interval, 1.24–73.77) more likely to have persistent incomplete bladder emptying after the follow-up office voiding trial.

Conclusion

Women with incomplete bladder emptying after multicompartment prolapse repair had a 7-fold higher risk of an unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial if performed within 4 days of surgery than when performed within 7 days of surgery. In addition, requiring additional prescriptions for analgesia increased the risk of an unsuccessful follow-up office voiding trial.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : catheter, incomplete emptying, pelvic organ prolapse, urinary retention, voiding trial


Plan


  A.R.P. has received a research grant from Neomedic . G.B. serves on the advisory board of Neotract and Olympus. G.W.D. is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Laborie, Coloplast, POP Medical; has received research grants from Alma Lasers , POP Medical , Coloplast , Wyeth / Pfizer , and Cook Biomedical ; and has received honoraria from Astelas, Laborie, Alma Lasers, and Ferring. C.A.M. has received grant support from and is a consultant for Boston Scientific and is an expert witness for Johnson and Johnson. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
  Cite this article as: Schachar JS, Ossin D, Plair AR, et al. Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:260.e1-9.


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 223 - N° 2

P. 260.e1-260.e9 - août 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial
  • Alexander A. Berger, Jasmine Tan-Kim, Shawn A. Menefee
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • A comprehensive model for pain management in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery: a prospective clinical practice study
  • Aparna S. Ramaseshan, David M. O’Sullivan, Adam C. Steinberg, Elena Tunitsky-Bitton

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.