S'abonner

A multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing urethral diverticulectomy with and without pubovaginal sling - 28/07/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.002 
Sarah E. Bradley, MD a, , Douglas A. Leach, MD c, Joseph Panza, MD d, Jessica Sassani, MD e, Christina Escobar, MD f, John Ogorek, MD g, Elisha Jackson, MD h, Patricia Hudson, MD i, Jennifer J. Hamner, DO j, Pamela E. Smith, MD k, Michelle Schroeder, MD l, Alexander Zeymo, MS b, Allison M. Wyman, MD h, Robert E. Gutman, MD a
a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC 
b Department of Biostatistics and Biomedical Informatics, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 
c Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 
d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 
f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 
g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory, Atlanta, GA 
h Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 
i Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 
j Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, UTSW, Dallas, TX 
k Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 
l Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ 

Corresponding author: Sarah E. Bradley, MD

Abstract

Background

Urethral diverticulum is a rare entity and requires a high suspicion for diagnosis based on symptoms and physical exam with confirmation by imaging. A common presenting symptom is stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The recommended treatment is surgical excision with urethral diverticulectomy. Postoperatively, approximately 37% of patients may have persistent and 16% may have de novo SUI. An autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (PVS) placed at the time of urethral diverticulectomy (UD) has the potential to prevent and treat postoperative SUI. However, little has been published about the safety and efficacy of a concomitant pubovaginal sling.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical presentation, outcomes, complications, and diverticulum recurrence rates in women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy with vs without a concurrent pubovaginal sling.

Study Design

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016. Study participants were identified by Current Procedure Terminology codes, and their records were reviewed for demographics, medical or surgical history, symptoms, preoperative testing, concomitant surgeries, and postoperative outcomes. Symptoms, recurrence rates, and complications were compared between women with and without a concomitant pubovaginal sling. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence symptoms. Based on a stress urinary incontinence rate of 50% with no pubovaginal sling and 10% with a pubovaginal sling, we needed a sample size of 141 participants who underwent diverticulectomy without a pubovaginal sling and 8 participants with a pubovaginal sling to achieve 83% power with P<.05.

Results

We identified 485 diverticulectomy cases from 11 institutions who met the inclusion criteria; of these, 96 (19.7%) cases had a concomitant pubovaginal sling. Women with a pubovaginal sling were older than those without a pubovaginal sling (53 years vs 46 years; P<.001), and a greater number of women with pubovaginal sling had undergone diverticulectomy previously (31% vs 8%; P<.001). Postoperative follow-up period (14.6±26.9 months) was similar between the groups. The pubovaginal sling group had greater preoperative stress urinary incontinence (71% vs 33%; P<.0001), dysuria (47% vs 30%; P=.002), and recurrent urinary tract infection (49% vs 33%; P=.004). The addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of diverticulectomy significantly improved the odds of stress urinary incontinence resolution after adjusting for prior diverticulectomy, prior incontinence surgery, age, race, and parity (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–5.03; P=.043). It was not significantly protective against de novo stress urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–2.92; P=.807). Concomitant pubovaginal sling increased the odds of postoperative short-term (<6 weeks) urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–6.22; P=.039) and long-term urinary retention (>6 weeks) (adjusted odds ratio, 6.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.20–22.11; P=.001), as well as recurrent urinary tract infections (adjusted odds ratio, 3.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–7.76; P=.013). There was no significant risk to develop a de novo overactive bladder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–3.91; P=.423) or urgency urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–3.06; P=.30). A concomitant pubovaginal sling was not protective against a recurrent diverticulum (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–2.82; P=.374). Overall, the diverticulum recurrence rate was 10.1% and did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

This large retrospective cohort study demonstrated a greater resolution of stress urinary incontinence with the addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of a urethral diverticulectomy. There was a considerable risk of postoperative urinary retention and recurrent urinary tract infections in the pubovaginal sling group.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : fascial sling, pubovaginal sling, stress urinary incontinence, urethral diverticulectomy, urethral diverticulum


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Bradley SE, Leach DA, Panza J, et al. A multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing urethral diverticulectomy with and without pubovaginal sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:273.e1-9.


© 2020  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 223 - N° 2

P. 273.e1-273.e9 - août 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The influence of postoperative environment on patient pain and satisfaction: a randomized trial
  • Austin M. Hill, Catrina C. Crisp, Abigail Shatkin-Margolis, Tiffanie Tam, Eunsun Yook, Steven Kleeman, Rachel N. Pauls
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • September 2019 (vol. 221, no. 3, page 175)

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.