S'abonner

Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen despite similarities with Ara h 6 - 05/09/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.026 
Oliver Hemmings, MSc a, b, c, George Du Toit, FRCPCH a, b, d, Suzana Radulovic, MD a, b, d, Gideon Lack, FRCPCH a, b, c, d, Alexandra F. Santos, MD, PhD a, b, c, d,
a Department of Women and Children’s Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom 
b Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom 
c Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom 
d Children’s Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom 

Corresponding author: Alexandra F. Santos, MD, PhD, Department of Paediatric Allergy, 2nd floor, South Wing, St Thomas’ Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom.Department of Paediatric AllergySt Thomas’ Hospital2nd floorSouth WingLondonSE1 7EHUnited Kingdom

Abstract

Background

Arachis hypogaea 2 (Ara h 2)-specific IgE is to date the best serologic marker to diagnose peanut allergy. Ara h 6 shares approximately 60% sequence identity and multiple epitopes with Ara h 2.

Objective

Our aim was to assess the diagnostic utility and relative importance of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 in peanut allergy.

Methods

A cohort 100 of children was studied. The cohort included chidren who had peanut allergy, children who were sensitized to but tolerant of peanut, and children who were neither sensitized nor allergic to peanut. Levels of specific IgE to peanut and individual allergens were quantified by using ImmunoCAP. ImmunoCAP inhibition experiments and mast cell activation tests in response to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were performed. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 14 and Prism version 7 software.

Results

Ara h 2–specific IgE and Ara h 6–specific IgE showed the greatest diagnostic accuracy for peanut allergy when compared with specific IgE to peanut and other peanut allergens. Most patients with peanut allergy were sensitized to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6. Ara h 2 reduced Ara h 2–specific IgE binding more than Ara h 6 did (P < .001), whereas Ara h 6–specific IgE binding was inhibited to a similar degree by Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (P = .432). In the mast cell activation test, Ara h 2 induced significantly greater maximal reactivity (P = .001) and a lower half maximal effective concentration (P = .002) than did Ara h 6 when testing cosensitized individuals.

Conclusions

Ara h 2–specific IgE and Ara h 6–specific IgE provide the greatest accuracy to diagnose peanut allergy. Ara h 2 is the dominant conglutin in peanut allergy in the United Kingdom, despite a degree of cross-reactivity with Ara h 6.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Graphical abstract




Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Ara h 2, Ara h 6, specific IgE, mast cell activation test, ImmunoCAP inhibition, peanut allergy, cross-reactivity

Abbreviations used : AIT, Ara h, EC50, MAT, OFC, ROC, SPT


Plan


 Supported by the Medical Research Council (Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship MR/M008517/1), Asthma UK (grant AUK-BC-2015-01), and the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre Award to Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: A. F. Santos reports grants and personal fees from the Medical Research Council (grant MR/M008517/1) and grants from Asthma UK and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) through a Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from the Immune Tolerance Network/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and from Asthma UK; personal fees from Thermo Scientific, Nutricia, Infomed, Novartis, Allergy Therapeutics, and Buhlmann; and research support from Buhlmann and Thermo Scientific through a collaboration agreement with King's College London. S. Radulovic reports grants from the NIAID of the NIH, the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA), and the National Peanut Board (NPB). G. Du Toit reports grants from the NIAID of the NIH, Food Allergy & Research Education, the UK Department of Health through the NIHR, the NPB, and UK FSA, all of which partly funded salary over the period of this submitted work. G. Lack reports grants from the NIHR through BRC award to the Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, the NPB, the UK FSA, and the Davis Foundation, as well as personal fees from Novartis, Aravax, ALK-Abello, DBV Technologies, and Mighty Mission Me. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2020  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 146 - N° 3

P. 621 - septembre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Belinostat resolves skin barrier defects in atopic dermatitis by targeting the dysregulated miR-335:SOX6 axis
  • Wen Chiy Liew, Gopinath M. Sundaram, Shan Quah, Guo Guang Lum, Jonathan S.L. Tan, Rajkumar Ramalingam, John E.A. Common, Mark B.Y. Tang, E. Birgitte Lane, Steven Tien Guan Thng, Prabha Sampath
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Toll-like receptor 2 impacts the development of oral tolerance in mouse pups via a milk-dependent mechanism
  • Bassel Dawod, Ian D. Haidl, Meghan B. Azad, Jean S. Marshall

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.