S'abonner

Lithium Versus Other Mood-Stabilizing Medications in a Longitudinal Study of Youth Diagnosed With Bipolar Disorder - 25/09/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.013 
Danella M. Hafeman, MD, PhD a, , Brian Rooks, PhD b, John Merranko, MA a, Fangzi Liao, MS a, Mary Kay Gill, MSN a, Tina R. Goldstein, PhD a, Rasim Diler, MD a, Neal Ryan, MD a, Benjamin I. Goldstein, MD c, David A. Axelson, MD d, Michael Strober, PhD e, Martin Keller, MD f, Jeffrey Hunt, MD f, Heather Hower, MSW f, Lauren M. Weinstock, PhD f, Shirley Yen, PhD f, Boris Birmaher, MD a
a University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
b University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 
c Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
d Nationwide Children’s Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus 
e University of California, Los Angeles 
f Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 

Correspondence to Danella M. Hafeman, MD, PhD, 3811 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 152133811 O’Hara StreetPittsburghPA15213

Abstract

Objective

Lithium is the mainstay for bipolar disorder (BD) treatment in adults, but evidence in youths is limited. We used data from the Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) study to assess whether lithium vs other mood-stabilizing medication (OMS) was associated with improved outcomes, including mood symptoms and suicidality.

Method

COBY is a naturalistic, longitudinal study of 413 youths, 7 to 17.11 years old at intake, with BD. At each visit, medication exposure, psychiatric symptoms, and psychosocial function over the preceding follow-up period were assessed using the Adolescent Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation. Using mixed models, we determined whether participants taking lithium vs OMS (but not lithium) differed regarding mood symptoms, suicidality, psychosocial function, hospitalization, aggression, and substance use.

Results

A total of 340 participants contributed 2,638 six-month follow-up periods (886 lithium, 1,752 OMS), over a mean follow-up of 10 years. During lithium (vs OMS) follow-up periods, participants were older, less likely to have lifetime anxiety, and less likely to be on antidepressants (p values<.005). After covariate adjustment, the lithium group (vs OMS) had half as many suicide attempts (p = .03), fewer depressive symptoms (p = .004), less psychosocial impairment (p = .003), and less aggression (p = .0004). Similar findings were observed in the subgroup of follow-up periods in which participants were <18 years old.

Conclusion

Findings are consistent with adult studies, showing that lithium is associated with decreased suicidality, less depression, and better psychosocial functioning. Given the paucity of evidence regarding lithium in children and adolescents, these findings have important clinical implications for the pharmacological management of youths with BD.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : bipolar disorder, child and adolescent, lithium, mood-stabilizing medications, suicidality


Plan


 This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants MH59929 (PI Boris Birmaher, MD), MH59977 (PI Michael Strober, PhD), MH59691 (PI Martin Keller, MD, and Shirley Yen, PhD), and MH110421 (PI Danella Hafeman, MD, PhD).
 Dr. Rooks and Mr. Merranko served as the statistical experts for this research.
 Disclosure: Dr. Hafeman has received grants from NIMH and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation. Dr. T. Goldstein has received grants from NIMH, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), and the Brain and Behavior Foundation and royalties from Guilford Press. Dr. Diler has received research support from NIMH. Dr. Ryan has received grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. B. Goldstein has received research support from Brain Canada, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation, NIMH, the Sunnybrook Hospital Department of Psychiatry, and the University of Toronto Department of Psychiatry. Dr. Axelson has received grants from NIMH and personal fees from Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and UpToDate. Dr. Strober has received research support from NIMH and as the Resnick Endowed Chair in Eating Disorders at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Keller has received research support from NIMH. Dr. Hunt has received honorarium from Wiley Publishers and has received support from the NIMH. Dr. Weinstock has received funding from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), NIMH, the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, and the National Institute of Justice. Dr. Yen has received research support from NIMH, NICCH, and AFSP and has served as a consultant at Janssen Global Services. Dr. Birmaher has received grants from NIMH and royalties from Random House, UpToDate, and Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. Ms. Hower has received funding from NIMH and honoraria from the US Department of Defense. Dr. Rooks, Mr. Merranko, Ms. Liao, and Ms. Gill have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.


© 2019  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 59 - N° 10

P. 1146-1155 - octobre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • White Matter Microstructure in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
  • Julia O. Linke, Nancy E. Adleman, Joelle Sarlls, Andrew Ross, Samantha Perlstein, Heather R. Frank, Kenneth E. Towbin, Daniel S. Pine, Ellen Leibenluft, Melissa A. Brotman
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Predicting Personalized Risk of Mood Recurrences in Youths and Young Adults With Bipolar Spectrum Disorder
  • Boris Birmaher, John A. Merranko, Mary Kay Gill, Danella Hafeman, Tina Goldstein, Benjamin Goldstein, Heather Hower, Michael Strober, David Axelson, Neal Ryan, Shirley Yen, Rasim Diler, Satish Iyengar, Michael W. Kattan, Lauren Weinstock, Martin Keller

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.