Stakeholder Perspective on Opioid Stewardship After Prostatectomy: Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators From the Pennsylvania Urology Regional Collaborative - 04/11/20
, Ruchika Talwar 1, 2, James Ding 1, Thenappan Chandrasekar 3, Kaynaat Syed 4, Claudette Fonshell 4, John Danella 5, Serge Ginzburg 6, Thomas Lanchoney 7, Jeffrey Tomaszewski 8, Edouard Trabulsi 3, Adam Reese 9, Marc Smaldone 10, Robert Uzzo 10, Jay D. Raman 11, Thomas J. Guzzo 1Abstract |
OBJECTIVE |
To evaluate existing practice patterns and potential barriers to implementing opioid stewardship protocols after robot-assisted prostatectomies among providers in the Pennsylvania Urology Regional Collaborative.
METHODS |
The Pennsylvania Urology Regional Collaborative (PURC) is a voluntary quality improvement initiative of 11 academic and community urology practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey representing 97 urologists. PURC distributed a web-based survey of 24 questions, with 74 respondents, including 56 attendings, 11 residents, and 7 advanced practice providers.
RESULTS |
More pills were prescribed if there was a default number of pills from the electronic health record (median 30) then if the number of pills was manually placed (P = .01). Only 8% discussed how to dispose of opioids with their patients, and less than a third of respondents discussed postoperative pain expectations or risks of opioid use. Patient level risk factors were often not reviewed, as 42% did not ask about previous opioid exposure.
CONCLUSION |
This study revealed extensive knowledge disparities among providers about opioid stewardship and significant gaps in the evidence-to-practice continuum of care. In the next year, PURC will be implementing targeted interventions to augment provider education, establish clear pathways for opioid disposal, improve utilization of known resources and implement opioid reduction protocols in all participating sites.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Financial Support: This project was supported by grant number K12HS026372 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. |
Vol 145
P. 120-126 - novembre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
