Demographics in general surgery programs: Relationship between female faculty and proportion of female residents - 17/11/20
, Simone Hyman, Marion C.W. HenryAbstract |
Introduction |
We hypothesized that general surgery programs with more female faculty and leadership may be associated with more female residents.
Methods |
The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access system (FREIDA) was assessed for chair gender, program director gender, percentage of female faculty, and percentage of female residents at general surgery residency programs. Programs were stratified by type: university-based (UB), community-based/university-affiliated (UA) and community-based (CB).
Results |
304 general surgery programs reported a mean of 38.4% female residents which did not differ by program type. Chairs were more likely female in UB programs (12.8%) versus 5.5% in UA and CB programs (p = 0.05). There were more female faculty at UB programs (23.3%) versus UA (21.7%) and CB (17.4%) (p = 0.04). Chair (p = 0.21), program director (p = 0.98) and faculty gender proportion (p = 0.40) was not associated with female resident complement.
Conclusions |
In general surgery programs, faculty and leadership gender composition was not associated with proportion of female residents.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | University-based general surgery programs have more female residents. |
• | University-based general surgery programs have more female faculty and leadership. |
• | More female faculty was not associated with more female residents. |
Keywords : Gender diversity, Women in surgery, General surgery, Surgery education, Program director, Surgery resident
Plan
Vol 220 - N° 5
P. 1189-1193 - novembre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
