S'abonner

Objective responses to first-line neoadjuvant carboplatin–paclitaxel regimens for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (ICON8): post-hoc exploratory analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial - 02/02/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30591-X 
Robert D Morgan, MBBS a, Iain A McNeish, ProfPhD b, Adrian D Cook, MSc c, Elizabeth C James, MSc c, Rosemary Lord, PhD d, Graham Dark, MBBS e, Rosalind M Glasspool, PhD f, Jonathan Krell, PhD b, Christine Parkinson, PhD g, Christopher J Poole, ProfMB BChir h, Marcia Hall, PhD i, Dolores Gallardo-Rincón, MD j, Michelle Lockley, PhD k, Sharadah Essapen, MD l, Jeff Summers, FRCR m, Anjana Anand, FRCR n, Abel Zachariah, FRCR o, Sarah Williams, MB ChB p, Rachel Jones, MD q, Kate Scatchard, PhD r, Axel Walther, PhD s, Jae-Weon Kim, ProfPhD t, Sudha Sundar, ProfMD u, Gordon C Jayson, ProfPhD a, Jonathan A Ledermann, ProfMD v, Andrew R Clamp, PhD a,
a The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 
b Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK 
c Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK 
d The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, UK 
e The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 
f Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK 
g Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK 
h Arden Cancer Research Centre, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK 
i Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK 
j Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico 
k St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK 
l Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK 
m Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK 
n Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK 
o Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK 
p University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK 
q South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK 
r Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK 
s University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK 
t Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea 
u Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK 
v UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK 

* Correspondence to: Dr Andrew R Clamp, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester Manchester M20 4BX UK

Summary

Background

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary surgery (DPS) is an established strategy for women with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Although this therapeutic approach has been validated in randomised, phase 3 trials, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) has not been reported. We describe RECIST and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 responses in patients receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS in the ICON8 trial.

Methods

ICON8 was an international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done across 117 hospitals in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Ireland. The trial included women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, life expectancy of more than 12 weeks, and newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; 1988) stage IC–IIA high-grade serous, clear cell, or any poorly differentiated or grade 3 histological subtype, or any FIGO (1988) stage IIB–IV epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6) and intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 by body surface area) on day 1 of every 21-day cycle (control group; group 1); intravenous carboplatin (AUC5 or AUC6) on day 1 and intravenous dose-fractionated paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 by body surface area) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21-day cycle (group 2); or intravenous dose-fractionated carboplatin (AUC2) and intravenous dose-fractionated paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 by body surface area) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21-day cycle (group 3). The maximum number of cycles of chemotherapy permitted was six. Randomisation was done with a minimisation method, and patients were stratified according to GCIG group, disease stage, and timing and outcome of cytoreductive surgery. Patients and clinicians were not masked to group allocation. The scheduling of surgery and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were determined by local multidisciplinary case review. In this post-hoc exploratory analysis of ICON8, progression-free survival was analysed using the landmark method and defined as the time interval between the date of pre-surgical planning radiological tumour assessment to the date of investigator-assessed clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred first. This definition is different from the intention-to-treat primary progression-free survival analysis of ICON8, which defined progression-free survival as the time from randomisation to the date of first clinical or radiological progression or death, whichever occurred first. We also compared the extent of surgical cytoreduction with RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses. This post-hoc exploratory analysis includes only women recruited to ICON8 who were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS and had RECIST and/or GCIG CA125-evaluable disease. ICON8 is closed for enrolment and follow-up, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01654146.

Findings

Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 women were enrolled in ICON8, of whom 779 (50%) were planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS. Median follow-up was 29·5 months (IQR 15·6–54·3) for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by DPS population. Of 564 women who had RECIST-evaluable disease at trial entry, 348 (62%) had a complete or partial response. Of 727 women who were evaluable by GCIG CA125 criteria at the time of diagnosis, 610 (84%) had a CA125 response. Median progression-free survival was 14·4 months (95% CI 9·2–28·0; 297 events) for patients with a RECIST complete or partial response and 13·3 months (8·1–20·1; 171 events) for those with RECIST stable disease. Median progression-free survival for women with a GCIG CA125 response was 13·8 months (95% CI 8·8–23·4; 544 events) and 9·7 months (5·8–14·5; 111 events) for those without a GCIG CA125 response. Complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in 187 (56%) of 335 women with a RECIST complete or partial response and 73 (42%) of 172 women with RECIST stable disease. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 290 (50%) of 576 women with a GCIG CA125 response and 30 (30%) of 101 women without a GCIG CA125 response.

Interpretation

The RECIST-defined radiological response rate was lower than that frequently quoted to patients in the clinic. RECIST and GCIG CA125 responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer should not be used as individual predictive markers to stratify patients who are likely to benefit from DPS, but instead used in conjunction with the patient’s clinical capacity to undergo cytoreductive surgery. A patient should not be denied surgery based solely on the lack of a RECIST or GCIG CA125 response.

Funding

Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, Health Research Board in Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 2

P. 277-288 - février 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab beyond progression versus carboplatin-based doublet alone in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial
  • Sandro Pignata, Domenica Lorusso, Florence Joly, Ciro Gallo, Nicoletta Colombo, Cristiana Sessa, Aristotelis Bamias, Vanda Salutari, Frédèric Selle, Simona Frezzini, Ugo De Giorgi, Patricia Pautier, Alessandra Bologna, Michele Orditura, Coraline Dubot, Angiolo Gadducci, Serafina Mammoliti, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Elena Zafarana, Enrico Breda, Laure Favier, Antonio Ardizzoia, Saverio Cinieri, Rémy Largillier, Daniela Sambataro, Emmanuel Guardiola, Rossella Lauria, Carmela Pisano, Francesco Raspagliesi, Giovanni Scambia, Gennaro Daniele, Francesco Perrone, MITO16b/MANGO–OV2/ENGOT–ov17 Investigators, S Pignata, D Lorusso, F Joly, C Gallo, N Colombo, C Sessa, A Bamias, V Salutari, F Selle, S Frezzini, U De Giorgi, P Pautier, A Bologna, M Orditura, C Dubot, A Gadducci, S Mammoliti, I Ray-Coquard, E Zafarana, E Breda, L Favier, A Ardizzoia, S Cinieri, R Largillier, D Sambataro, E Guardiola, R Lauria, C Pisano, F Raspagliesi, G Scambia, G Daniele, F Perrone
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group
  • Renée L Mulder, Anna Font-Gonzalez, Melissa M Hudson, Hanneke M van Santen, Erik A H Loeffen, Karen C Burns, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Julianne Byrne, Riccardo Haupt, W Hamish Wallace, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Antoinette Anazodo, Richard A Anderson, Anke Barnbrock, Joern D Beck, Annelies M E Bos, Isabelle Demeestere, Christian Denzer, Natascia Di Iorgi, Holly R Hoefgen, Rejin Kebudi, Cornelis Lambalk, Thorsten Langer, Lillian R Meacham, Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg, Catharyn Stern, Eveline Stutz-Grunder, Wendy van Dorp, Margreet Veening, Saskia Veldkamp, Eline van der Meulen, Louis S Constine, Lisa B Kenney, Marianne D van de Wetering, Leontien C M Kremer, Jennifer Levine, Wim J E Tissing, PanCareLIFE Consortium, Claire Berger, Tamara Diesch, Uta Dirksen, Jill Ginsberg, Aleksander Giwercman, Desiree Grabow, Clarisa Gracia, Sarah E Hunter, Julia Inthorn, Peter Kaatsch, Joanne F Kelvin, James L Klosky, Joop S E Laven, Barbara A Lockart, Sebastian JCMM Neggers, Norbert W Paul, Michelle Peate, Bob Phillips, Damon R Reed, Eva Maria E Tinner, Marleen van den Berg, Chris Verhaak

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.