S'abonner

Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study - 23/02/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.029 
Jessica L. Bienstock, MD, MPH a, , Pooja Shivraj, MS, PhD b, Kenji Yamazaki, PhD c, AnnaMarie Connolly, MD d, George Wendel, MD b, Stanley J. Hamstra, PhD c, Eric S. Holmboe, MD c
a Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 
b American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dallas, TX 
c Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL 
d Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 

Corresponding author: Jessica L. Bienstock, MD, MPH.

Abstract

Background

Since the launch of the Outcome Project in 2001, the graduate medical education community has been working to implement the 6 general competencies. In 2014, all Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs implemented specialty-specific milestones to advance competency-based assessment. Each clinical competency committee of the Obstetrics and Gynecology program assesses all residents twice a year on the milestones. These data are reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as part of a continuous quality improvement effort in graduate medical education.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and residency program graduates’ performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying (written) examination.

Study Design

We conducted a validity study of all graduating (postgraduate year 4) Obstetrics and Gynecology residents in 2017 within Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited United States training programs (1260 residents from 242 programs). This cohort of residents began receiving milestone assessments during their postgraduate year 2 in 2014; the first-year milestones were implemented for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited Obstetrics and Gynecology programs. This cohort completed their sixth and final milestone assessment at graduation in June 2017 for a total of 6 periods of milestone assessments. Data regarding each resident’s milestone ratings in each of the 28 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education subcompetencies for Obstetrics and Gynecology were assessed for their association with candidates’ American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores using a generalized estimating equation regression model.

Results

Data were available and analyzed from 1184 residents from 240 programs, representing 94% of the total academic year 2017 graduates of Obstetrics and Gynecology residency training programs. There was a substantial association between most milestone ratings at the 6 assessment points and candidates’ performance on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination. The strongest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology were within all 7 of the subcompetencies of Medical Knowledge (range of slope correlation coefficients at final milestone ratings 3.84–5.17; slope coefficients can be interpreted as the gain in qualifying examination points per unit increase in milestone level). At the final milestone assessment, but more modest associations with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores were also seen with 9 of the 11 Patient Care and Procedural Skills subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Practice-Based Learning and Improvement subcompetencies, the 2 of 2 Systems-Based Practice subcompetencies, and 2 of the 3 Professionalism subcompetencies. Only 1 of the 3 Interpersonal and Communication Skills subcompetencies was associated with American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores.

Conclusion

The pattern of associations between the qualifying examination scores and milestone ratings for the 2017 graduating cohort of Obstetrics and Gynecology residents followed a logical pattern, with the strongest associations seen in Medical Knowledge, and lower to no associations in subcompetencies not as effectively assessed on multiple-choice examinations. Although some positive associations were noted for non-Medical Knowledge milestones, these associations could be caused by correlational rating errors with further study needed to better understand these patterns.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : certification examination, milestones, validity


Plan


 E.S.H. receives royalties for a textbook on assessment from Elsevier. The other authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Bienstock JL, Shivraj P, Yamazaki K, et al. Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:308.e1-25.


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 224 - N° 3

P. 308.e1-308.e25 - mars 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The association between fetal head station at the first diagnosis of the second stage of labor and delivery outcomes
  • Eran Ashwal, Isabella Y. Fan, Howard Berger, Michal Y. Livne, Liran Hiersch, Amir Aviram, Ariel Mani, Yariv Yogev
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Fetus in fetu prenatal and postnatal images
  • Miguel Parra-Saavedra, Amanda Barrero-Ortega, Guido Parra-Anaya

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.