The benefit of adding lidocaine to ketamine during rapid sequence endotracheal intubation in patients with septic shock: A randomised controlled trial - 24/03/21
, Maha Mostafa a, Ezzat Ramzy a, Khaled Sarhan a, Tarek Almenesey b, Ahmed G. Safina c, Osama Hosny a, Ghada Adel Hamden a, Ahmed A. Gado a, Ali Mokhtar aBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 7 |
| Iconographies | 4 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Background |
Patients with septic shock commonly require endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre, the emergency department, and the intensive care unit. Hypotension is a serious complication after induction of general anaesthesia, especially in patients with circulatory failure. No randomised controlled trials had previously investigated protocols for induction of anaesthesia in septic shock patients. The aim of the current work is to compare two protocols, lidocaine–ketamine combination versus ketamine full-dose for rapid-sequence endotracheal intubation in patients with septic shock.
Methods |
Forty-four adult patients, with septic shock, scheduled for emergency surgical intervention were enrolled in this randomised, double-blinded, controlled study. Patients were randomised to receive either 1 mg/kg ketamine (ketamine group, n = 22) or 0.5 mg/kg ketamine plus 1 mg/kg lidocaine (ketamine-lidocaine group, n = 22) for induction of anaesthesia in addition to 0.05 mg/kg midazolam (in both groups). Our primary outcome was the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Other outcomes included frequency of post-induction hypotension, heart rate, and cardiac output.
Results |
Forty-three patients were available for final analysis. The average MAP reading in the first 5 min post-induction was higher in ketamine-lidocaine group than in the ketamine group {82.8 ± 5.6 mmHg and 73 ± 10.2 mmHg, P < 0.001}. Furthermore, the incidence of post-intubation hypotension was lower in the ketamine-lidocaine group than in the ketamine group {1 patient (5%) versus 17 patients (77%), P < 0.001}. The ketamine-lidocaine group showed higher MAP in almost all the readings after induction compared to ketamine group. Other haemodynamic variables including cardiac output and heart rate were comparable between both study groups.
Conclusion |
Lidocaine–ketamine combination showed less incidence of hypotension compared to ketamine full-dose when used for rapid-sequence endotracheal intubation in patients with septic shock.
Registration URL |
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03844984?cond=NCT03844984&rank=1
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviation : MAP, SPSS, ANOVA
Keywords : Ketamine, Lidocaine, Septic shock, Anaesthesia, Endotracheal intubation
Plan
Vol 40 - N° 1
Article 100731- février 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Are we correctly treating invasive candidiasis under continuous renal replacement therapy with echinocandins? Preliminary in vitro assessment
- Frederic J. Baud, Vincent Jullien, Philippe-Henri Secrétan, Pascal Houzé, Lionel Lamhaut
- Two per cent alcoholic chlorhexidine versus alcoholic five per cent povidone-iodine for the prevention of perineural catheter colonisation: The CHLOVEPI randomised, controlled trial
- Hakim Harkouk, Tristan Thibault-Sogorb, Alain Beauchet, Florence Espinasse, Christine Lawrence, Valeria Martinez, Dominique Fletcher
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?