S'abonner

Outpatient shoulder prostheses: Feasibility, acceptance and safety - 20/05/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102913 
Caroline Cointat a, Marc Olivier Gauci a, Michel Azar a, Laurie Tran c, Christophe Trojani a, b, Pascal Boileau a,
a Unité de recherche clinique Côte d’Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France 
b Groupe Kantys, institut de chirurgie réparatrice locomoteur et du sport (ICR), 7, avenue Durante, 06000 Nice, France 
c Service d’anesthésie-réanimation, institut Arnault-Tzanck, 171, rue du Commandant Gaston-Cahuzac, 06700 Saint-Laurent-du-Var, France 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Introduction

Outpatient surgery in France is defined by the national authority for health (HAS) as a scheduled surgery enabling same-day discharge without any increased risk to the patient. With the advent of enhanced recovery after surgery, outpatient lower limb arthroplasty has become a common procedure. However, only 1.1% of knee arthroplasties in France were performed on an outpatient basis in 2017.

Objectives

1) assess early morbidity and mortality after outpatient shoulder arthroplasties to validate eligibility and safety criteria; and 2) assess patient acceptance of outpatient surgery.

Methods

A single-center study with the following inclusion criteria: primary shoulder arthroplasty, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score I or II, no cognitive impairment, and no coronary artery or thromboembolic diseases. Analgesia was provided by bupivacaine via a peripheral nerve catheter in the first 72 hours followed by oral analgesics. Patients were discharged if the post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) was>9/10 and the visual analog scale (VAS) was<5/10. Postoperative telephone interviews were carried out on D1, D2 and D3 to assess pain with the numerical rating scale and to collect data on their analgesic consumption. All patients were seen by an independent observer at one and six months for a clinical and radiologic follow-up and at 90 days during a consultation with the senior surgeon. The primary endpoint was the 90-day morbidity and mortality rate (readmissions, rehospitalizations, and minor and major complications). A satisfaction questionnaire was collected at one and six months.

Results

Thirty-six patients were offered an outpatient shoulder arthroplasty between February 2016 and February 2018: 12 (33%) refused with no valid reasons and 24 patients agreed to the procedure (seven hemiarthroplasties, nine anatomic shoulder arthroplasties and eight reverse shoulder arthroplasties). The mean age at surgery was 70 years (55–82), mean body mass index (BMI) was 26 (21–32) and 14 patients were ASA II (66%). Three patients (12%) refused same-day discharge despite a PADSS score>9/10 and adequate pain management. Two patients (8%) were not discharged home on the same day as the surgery for medical reasons (one for pain and one for high blood pressure). No readmissions or complications were reported for the 19 outpatient arthroplasties. None of the outpatients used opioids. All patients were satisfied with their functional outcome, 84% were satisfied with the outpatient management and 17% felt they were insufficiently monitored and regretted that they were not hospitalized.

Conclusions

1) outpatient shoulder arthroplasty can be safely proposed to selected patients with low comorbidities, regardless of their age and type of implant; 2) the acceptance rate for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty remained low among our patient population. These results should incite us to better educate patients about outpatient surgery.

Level of evidence

IV; retrospective study.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Shoulder arthroplasty, Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Outpatient surgery


Plan


© 2021  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 107 - N° 4

Article 102913- juin 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Comparison of elution characteristics and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cements with and without superficial vancomycin coating (SVC) in the late phase of polymerization
  • Viktor Labmayr, Markus H. Lerchbaumer, Klaus-Dieter Kuehn, Clemens Kittinger, Florian Amerstorfer, Andreas Leithner, Mathias Glehr
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Promising results after hemi-shoulder arthroplasty using pyrolytic carbon heads in young and middle-aged patients
  • Stefanos Tsitlakidis, Julian Doll, Fabian Westhauser, Matthias Wolf, Pit Hetto, Michael Maier, Boris Sowa

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.